Talk:Luggnagg

This page was proposed for deletion by Piotrus (talk · contribs) on 25 September 2020.

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses a sub-category of Category:Book stubs on the article page.

If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
If you disagree with this assessment, please:

Change the above "class=stub" to "class=start" or another applicable class per Wikipedia:WikiProject Books/Assessment#Quality scale;
Remove the stub template from the article.

Merge from Struldbrugg

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of the discussion, and noting the similar proposal and AfD, was not merged. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:29, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While reviewing Talk:Gulliver's_Travels#Merger_proposal, I've noticed that User:PatGallacher proposed such a merger, which was seconded by User:Toughpigs. Nobody however started the proper discussion, so here it goes (and count me as the third support vote for this - however, see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Struldbrugg, closed as keep not that long ago). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:58, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm opposed; What is the reason for this merger? I don’t see much overlap or duplication, and the article is bigger than stub size. Why do you want these articles merged? Also, if your AfD failed because the term has independent notability, then there is a clear reason not to merge. Moonraker12 (talk) 12:30, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.