Talk:Status Update

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Romance Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Infobox list of actors

@IJBall: I think Whaledon was getting at the fact that, per the latest poster, those were the actors listed in the billing block. That is the billing block, right, the text at the bottom? Or when you say "billing block", are you only referring to the "above line" credits? —Joeyconnick (talk) 22:30, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Joeyconnick: FTR, I could not read this poster's billing block (and it's not at IMDb), as per it being low-res. But, in this particular case, there seems to be no compelling reason not to list simply the "above the line" credits – there is little doubt that Lynch and Holt are the "primary stars" here. YMMV. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:36, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@IJBall: Just FYI, the poster is at IMDb. It's not easy to read but that version is legible. —Joeyconnick (talk) 23:24, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for that. WP:FILMCAST has some wise words on this kind of thing, and I still think that leaving the infobox listing to just Lynch and Holt makes the most sense in this particular case, rather than doing a "laundry list" of most of the cast. But I guess I no longer object if someone insists upon going with the billing block listing over the concise "above the line" listing. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:58, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]