Talk:Charleston riot of 1919
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Editorial response
[edit]This is a good article, but I noticed that it didn't include any Charleston sources. While pulling some of those up, I saw the editorial from one of Charleston's big papers the next day. The editorial is, by any modern view, an insanely self-congratulatory excuse for the incidents. I think it is important to include to show what the City's position was. On the one hand, I don't want the quote to read like a current excuse for the incident, but I also don't want to intro it with any editorializing about its position. Any thoughts on how to handle it?--ProfReader (talk) 15:04, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- C-Class South Carolina articles
- High-importance South Carolina articles
- WikiProject South Carolina articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Law enforcement articles
- Mid-importance Law enforcement articles
- WikiProject Law Enforcement articles
- C-Class Human rights articles
- High-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- C-Class African diaspora articles
- High-importance African diaspora articles
- WikiProject African diaspora articles
- C-Class United States History articles
- Mid-importance United States History articles
- WikiProject United States History articles