Talk:Cheshire East
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Admin centre?
[edit]Any news on which town will be the main admin centre for the new authority? David (talk) 18:22, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- It's to be confirmed, but pick one from Crewe, Macclesfield or Congleton. Crewe is biggest, Macclesfield is most central, but Congleton has the nicest offices, so with my cynical hat on, it'll probably end up being Congleton. Neıl ☎ 11:09, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Does Congleton okay, I believe you . Sandbach has the newest building at Westfields they are very new and they are also very Central far more than Macclesfield and it is easier to get to by the motorway. ARBAY (talk) 22:44, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- It has been decided that administration will all be at Westfields in Sandbach with Meetings swapping between different venues.[ http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk/news/Westfields-extended/article-231198-detail/article.html] ARBAY TALKies 11:28, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- Just been confirmed that it will be Sandbach. Richard B (talk) 11:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Will East Cheshire council be keeping any of the other sites or will Sandbach be the only council building they will operate -anon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.228.59 (talk) 18:51, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Rationale
[edit]What was the justification for scrapping the previous system of local government in Cheshire, which seemed to work satisfactorily? Reorganisations are expensive and disruptive, and the rates went up, albeit not by much. How will the success of the two new unitary authorities be measured?Ausseagull (talk) 21:42, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- As far as I am aware the rationale was efficiency, i.e. saving money. The chnnges were more or less imposed by central government; I don't remember there being much will in the community, and the ugly split into two wasn't a popular decision. Dadge (talk) 14:52, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Parliamentary Constituencies
[edit]I was of the impression that the Eddisbury constituency was part of Cheshire West and Chester and not Cheshire East however Stephen O'Brien is listed as an MP representing Cheshire East in the side box of the Cheshire East page can anyone confirm this information and if correct make the appropriate changes. MikeJKemp (talk) 21:54, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
- Bits of the Eddisbury constituency are certainly within Cheshire East - as our article says, Acton, Audlem, Bunbury, Minshull, Peckforton, and Wrenbury were transferred from Crewe & Nantwich to Eddisbury in the 2007 boundary adjustments, but they're still part of the council area. -- Arwel Parry (talk) 23:26, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Infobox glitch
[edit]The "motto" field in the infobox gives "Motto of the County Council". However, Cheshire East has a Borough Council. This is clearly a feature of the Template:Infobox England county unitary. Unfortunately Template:Infobox England borough unitary or indeed Template:Infobox England district unitary do not exist so I'm not sure how to fix this? Lozleader (talk) 16:51, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
The Wrong Ms Bruce
[edit]I edited the list MPs as it linked to the wrong Fiona Bruce.109.154.67.142 (talk) 20:28, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cheshire East. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090517000027/http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2008/uksi_20080634_en_2#pt2-l1g3 to http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2008/uksi_20080634_en_2#pt2-l1g3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:18, 21 November 2016 (UTC)