Jump to content

Talk:Zaid Jabri

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 04:24, 13 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Comments on editing the draft

[edit]

Hello, @Zaher Alkaei: As you can see in your draft, I have copyedited some of the text and think this might be enough for the administator to release the draft. As your draft mentions several reliable sources, but not all formatted according to WP usual rules, I have converted them into references as usual and added a new one from a German website. If you are only referencing one source that may identically be re-used a few times, you don't have to use SFN. This is only useful, if you are referencing different pages as you have done for Silverstein and Belyaeva. Please check the sources as they are now and make necessary additions or changes according to your understanding of them. Finally, I will be glad to see the article released, joining my article on Kareem Roustom and others from Damascus. - Cheers, Munfarid1 (talk) 15:45, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! Great work! Thanks for the advice concerning the references. I will read your other articles. Best, Zaher Zaher Alkaei (talk) 00:24, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New comments on revised draft page to reviewer

[edit]

Hello, @Mattdaviesfsic: Thanks for your review of this draft of January 14, 2023. I see your points, and have made several changes, included RS and made the whole table of compostions invisible. - This draft and table was initially written by another editor, but since I am interested and somwhat knowledgable about Syrian contemporary music, I have continued to edit it according to your and previous reviews. As you certainly still have the text and its earlier shortcomings in mind, I want to suggest you have another look at it now. If you think, we should delete the table altogether, I have no problem with that. If we want to keep it for a later complete source about these compositions, the current option of making it invisible for readers might be acceptable. (I have no experience with this kind of interim solution.) - Anyway, thank you very much for your interest and comments. Munfarid1 (talk) 12:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for picking this up, looks a lot better now, and I think it's probably ready to go to mainspace - and yes, I think making the table invisible was probably a good idea! Feel free to resubmit when you want to and myself or another editor will review - and probably accept - it. Well done, and thanks again. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 12:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your quick and encouraging response. I have just resubmitted the draft. Munfarid1 (talk) 19:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]