Talk:Treaty of Rome
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on March 25, 2012 and March 25, 2013. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
First Treaty of Rome
Need change the article's name in First Treaty of Rome because in October 2006 in Rome was signed the Second Treaty (European Constitution)--87.17.103.92 15:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Daughter articles
Should other articles be made daughter articles and summarized here? For example: Article 81 and Article 82. On the other hand, that may duplicate information in other articles. Should the Article 81 and 82 articles be renamed. This is not really just a case of disambiguation. --Boson 07:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Euratom
Having Euratom has a footnote in this article isn't right, there ought to be two seperate articles or, considering the lack of indiviudal information, have the article as "Treaties of Rome". Opinions?- J Logan t: 20:59, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- I totally agree. I've thought about this also. One article is sufficient, but it should be renamed. - SSJ ☎ 23:02, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
interwiki
There are three aritcles about it in some foreign-language wikis, as in the German one:
From: Römische Verträge (Treaties of Rome): Den EWG-Vertrag und den ebenfalls 1957 unterzeichneten Vertrag zur Gründung der Europäischen Atomgemeinschaft (EURATOM) bezeichnet man als die Römischen Verträge.
- Vertrag zur Gründung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft, from 1957 - 1992 Vertrag zur Gründung der Europäischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft (EWG-Vertrag) → European Economic Community
- Vertrag zur Gründung der Europäischen Atomgemeinschaft (EURATOM)
--Haigst-Mann (talk) 14:26, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:€2 commemorative coin France 2007 TOR.jpg
The image Image:€2 commemorative coin France 2007 TOR.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Rewrite needed
The following two constructions are in the Renaming section
"The 1993 Treaty of Maastricht established the European Union with the EEC becoming one of its three pillars, the European Community.
"When the Treaty of Lisbon came into force in 2009 the pillar system, and hence the Community."
173.210.125.42 (talk) 15:04, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Splitting the article
While I certainly appreciate the reason behind naming this article as treaties (plural) of Rome, I think it an awkward compromise. "Treaties of Rome" is not an expression I can ever remember hearing outside of Wikipedia. There were indeed two treaties signed in Rome on the same day but — in English at least — people refer to the "Treaty of Rome" and mean the EEC Treaty.
I'd suggest splitting the Article by:
- moving this article to Treaty of Rome making appropriate adjustments, and
- creating a new article at Euratom Treaty in respect of that treaty.
— Blue-Haired Lawyer t 14:41, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- I agree; this is a bit of a forced marriage of two very different things. The "treaty of Rome"-page should have a clear disambiguation regarding the i) present consolidated version (treaty establishing the EU) and Euratom... L.tak (talk) 15:47, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Treaty of Rome.jpg Nominated for Deletion
![]() |
An image used in this article, File:Treaty of Rome.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Treaty of Rome.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC) |
What is the TEEC ?
The third paragraph commences with a reference to the "TEEC" without prior mention or explication of this acronym. A casual web search leads me to understand this as meaning "Treaty establishing the European Economic Community", is this the same as "TFEU" ? Should it not be cleat what this is before using the acronym ?
I came here to learn about a subject that is new to me so I'm afraid I cannot correct this article myself. The found some information about this, such as at http://en.euabc.com/word/899 but I don't understand this either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.152.110.84 (talk) 10:57, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Merge
There are two pages for the same treaty, here and Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. This makes no sense and creates a complete mess on Wikidata. Sigur (talk) 19:20, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2012)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2013)
- Start-Class European history articles
- High-importance European history articles
- All WikiProject European history pages
- Start-Class European Union articles
- High-importance European Union articles
- WikiProject European Union articles
- Start-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Start-Class Cold War articles
- Low-importance Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- Start-Class International relations articles
- Mid-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles