Talk:The Five Love Languages
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Citation
I attempted to track down the citation needed for the following line:
Research does, however, support the portion of Chapman's work on self-regulating behavior to match a partner's wants and needs.[citation needed]
I am not sure if what I have found is 'good enough' ('primary'?) or if it needs a subsection different than critisms since its technically a support?
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pere.12182
2603:6010:C100:827B:E171:38A1:4D1E:777C (talk) 17:09, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
- Single studies are not usually very reliable. It's usually best to use review articles, which involve academics reading a bunch of studies and then interpreting the results for us. However if you were to add that Wiley link as a citation that's probably better than nothing. Should probably avoid ResearchGate links since ResearchGate is often a red flag for preprints. Not in this case, but still, I think using the Wiley link is better. Hope this helps. –Novem Linguae (talk) 22:31, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
When someone love u
when someone loves u;you must show she or he that love and they become lovers 41.116.125.233 (talk) 18:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Evangelical Christianity articles
- High-importance Evangelical Christianity articles
- C-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- C-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- C-Class psychology articles
- Low-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles