This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 10:53, 14 February 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Law}}, {{WikiProject Law Enforcement}}, {{WikiProject Psychology}}, {{WikiProject Crime}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 10:53, 14 February 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Law}}, {{WikiProject Law Enforcement}}, {{WikiProject Psychology}}, {{WikiProject Crime}}.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Merge - This article is small enough to fit in a section of it's own, all we need is a couple of citations and we could possibly do this. OMGWEEGEE2 (talk) 13:04, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Do Not Merge - While a forced cofession has a high likelihood of being false, it is not necessarily false. Most forced confessions will be forced false confessions, but the use of force does not in theory make all confessions explicitely untrue. Some in the US government have claimed to have received good intel from enhanced interrigations. Our biggest concern should be that material here in unsourced, not article merging. Kjphill1977 (talk) 00:01, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pierre Broué went through Trotsky’s private papers in the Harvard Trotsky Archive and found Trotsky writing about conspiring with various oppositionists the USSR, including Bukharin and Sokolnikov. J. Arch Getty concluded either Trotsky’s wife or Trotskyite historians had censored the archive. Cohen concluded in his biography of Bukharin that he wasn’t tortured and eye including MacLean (who wrote in his “Eastern Approaches” that the accused confessed to protect the legitimacy of communism rather than because if torture) and foreign diplomats allowed to witness the trial all concluded the suspects weren’t tortured, as did post-Soviet Russian historians who studied the minutes. Grigori Tokaev and Alexander Zinoviev, both from the safety of the west and after Stalin died, claimed they were involved in this anti-soviet conspiracy. Stalin, Kaganovich and Dmitrov all genuinely believed the accused of being guilty, as indicated by unpublished private works and Stalin also accused people who were not persecuted. Or in other words, those accused were actually guilty and admitted this without being tortured. NatriumGedrogt (talk) 21:28, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
