Jump to content

Talk:Houses at 37–47 North Fifth Street

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 16:50, 14 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Untitled[edit]

source to save for history section. Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability?[edit]

What's the argument for notability? Is being on a national register sufficient here, is the register sufficiently exclusive that being registered is notable? Is being a subject of local urban renewal international notability? Can someone clarify? Fifelfoo (talk) 04:40, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's been established via past discussions that nearly all NRHPs are inherently notable. –Juliancolton | Talk 05:51, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not in anything under WP:Notability. 80,000 inherently notable encyclopedic entries? And "Nearly all" is not all. So where's the policy or the discussion? Fifelfoo (talk) 08:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
To expand, checking on your assertion through the project's discussions rather than Wikipedia's notability policies, the archives from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_National_Register_of_Historic_Places demonstrate internal group-think; and begin by making claims such as you did that a previous consensus was achieved within wikipedia; further, the two cases cited where review external to the project occured (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Henry_F._Miller_House) and (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Abbeville_Opera_House) make a seriously flawed claim that the grounds for US government registration are identical with encyclopedic notability. Fifelfoo (talk) 08:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
See this, which is explicit on the point. Daniel Case (talk) 18:27, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]