Talk:Great Sutton

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cheshire Low‑importance

	Cheshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment Report

Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
~~Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)~~ - added 3 April 2008
Photos need to be added.
References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)

Peter I. Vardy 20:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2006

Hi. You might have noticed that I have made two edits to this article removing the majority of the content. I will not be making a third edit of this nature, as I do not wish to fall foul of the three revert rule. However, I believe that it is important that we resolve the issues I have with the article.

At the moment, I would suggest that much of the article is not notable, not verifiable and not written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia.

The best way to show that my concerns are unfounded would be to provide some references from non-trivial sources for the information in the article. If references cannot be found, then the information does not have a place on Wikipedia, as WP:V states.

There is definate potential in some of this article, and I hope that by working together we are able to improve it to a level that makes it appropriate for Wikipedia. Ollie 17:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great Sutton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111003153350/http://www.ellesmereport.org.uk/localhistory/ellesmereport/urbanisation/urbanisation.htm to http://www.ellesmereport.org.uk/localhistory/ellesmereport/urbanisation/urbanisation.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great Sutton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111003153358/http://www.ellesmereport.org.uk/localhistory/localvillages/greatsutton/greatsutton.htm to http://www.ellesmereport.org.uk/localhistory/localvillages/greatsutton/greatsutton.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:48, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]