Talk:Kosambi

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

A fact from Kosambi appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 April 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Kosambi, a city in ancient India which was a frequent site of sermons by the Buddha, was one of the places considered suitable for his Parinibbāna?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/April.

Wikipedia

Content is adapted from Pali Dictionary of Proper Names, which is in Public Domain.Greetings, Sacca 11:28, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kosambi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604160714/http://www.dailynews.lk/2007/12/05/fea06.asp to http://www.dailynews.lk/2007/12/05/fea06.asp
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160513183352/http://kaushambhi.nic.in/ to http://kaushambhi.nic.in/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160513183352/http://kaushambhi.nic.in/ to http://kaushambhi.nic.in/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:56, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Kausambi coin 9th Century BC.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:37, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ghoshitaram Monastery

I'm a bit confused as to how exactly the date "6th century BCE" was sourced. As it is, if this monastery really dates to the early Mahajanapada era it would be quite a significant site considering that the only other surviving monastery from the era, Jivakarama Vihara, is far less expansive than the image included in the article for Ghoshitaram.