Talk:List of cider brands

Food and drink: Beverages Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is within the scope of the Beverages Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

magners?

katy's?

this page's got holes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.189.101.83 (talk • contribs)

Umm, Welcome to Wikipedia,

the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit. If content is missing, add it! (Magners is on list but is called Bulmers) Rex the first ^{talk | contribs} 23:48, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Foundry Cider (which I think is owned by Guinness, but couldn't find a reference). Also, 3 Hammers is in the list twice under '3' and 'Three' so we probably want to clean that up. 184.70.110.26 (talk) 20:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Fruit" Ciders

We need to distinguish between ciders with fruit juice or flavourings added, and "ciders" made with those fruits. In most cases this isn't a problem - the way Kopparberg make their "cranberry cider" is obvious - but how do we distinguish between "pear cider" and perry? A regular cider drinker should usually be able to work out which is which, but how can we make this clear for the general reader? RomanSpa 23:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

references

names w/o articles or references need to go. we are not a directory. all info must be notable and confirmable.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:39, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

done, the names are in the edit history, if anyone wants to return them with refs.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:26, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work. I'd be tempted to get rid of the one red link remaining because all the reference shows is that it exists, not that it is especially notable, i.e. it is only mentioned in passing on the page. --Bob Re-born (talk) 06:42, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

clean up needed

The list should have no references and no red links. It should just be a list of notable companies, linking to their article in EN WP. The article should take care of references and establishing notability. As it is now it is spamming lots of URLs for NN companies. If there is no opposition, I will clean this up in a few days time). (see List of bean-to-bar chocolate manufacturers as an example of how it should be) -- Alexf^(talk) 15:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Last call for comments. The request was posted 20 days ago and not a peep, for or against. Cleanup will be done this week. All entries without an article in EN.WP will be removed. This is not a place for advertisement. If you want a company in the list, write an article. -- Alexf^(talk) 11:35, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexf: I guess this slipped down the back of the sofa all those months ago...? ;) anyway, I think it looks better now- although I left the refs for the time being. Great minds (eventuallly!) think alike! — fortunavelut luna 03:04, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In a way. It is still in my list of things to do, but RL gets in the way. Good job. -- Alexf^(talk) 11:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Them honey-dos, eh? ;) Thanks! — fortunavelut luna 11:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]