Jump to content

Talk:Chuck Taylor All-Stars

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by 70.163.208.142 (talk) at 03:56, 17 February 2024 (Low top is not CT). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cwalmsley94.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

not a subsidiary

[edit]

nike bought the brand name when the company went out of business. i don't think "subsidiary" is the right term.

2601:48:C601:50E0:247F:1E95:5B7C:F9FE (talk) 20:25, 1 March 2021 (UTC)gtbear@gmail.com[reply]

Source given later in article - [1] - states Nike "agreed to buy Converse.” A slightly fuller timeline might be synthesized from [2] and [3], but I can find nothing referencing an IP-only deal. V/R, 50.81.24.10 (talk) 00:53, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uses of chuck Taylor

[edit]

Gdhdjn&r 105.112.61.236 (talk) 20:31, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Low top is not CT

[edit]

While for all intents and purposes the low top is the same shoe, only the high top version is a Chuck Taylor. They are however both Converse All-Stars. Chuck Taylor is synonymous with the high top version bearing the round patch. The photo of the shoes here is unfortunate as it shows the low top version which as mentioned is technically not a Chuck Taylor & is just slightly less infamous in pop culture. (I don’t know how to submit an edit request but this is my attempt) HoyaLibris (talk) 01:13, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That picture was recently changed, in this edit.[4] Aesthetically I prefer the older high-top picture, but does this article say "the low top version ... is technically not a Chuck Taylor"? 70.163.208.142 (talk) 03:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]