Talk:The Gateway Pundit
![]() | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Q1: Should this article describe The Gateway Pundit as a fake news website?
A1: Yes, the "fake news website" descriptor is amply and reliably sourced. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Gateway Pundit article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days ![]() |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Why are you deleting updates
Why are bots deleting updates of Gateway Pundits. Are they hiding the truth, ranked 750 in all USA websites. 2603:7000:C400:EDD:35F7:D1:F77A:6D07 (talk) 00:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Which updates are missing from this article? — Newslinger talk 04:36, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 14 November 2023
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Gateway Pundit is not a "satirical ", nor a "conspiracy " site. The description given by the far-left editors at Wikipedia falsely state this to try and discredit a news site that links articles Wikipedia does not like. Please remove your personal and editorial bias. 2600:1004:B300:557:7CD3:1D28:C9C0:1A62 (talk) 02:38, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Not done: The article does not use the word "satirical" even once. What it does do, however, is describe the website as far-right (a statement backed by fifteen sources), a fake news website (a statement backed by ten sources), and being known for publishing conspiracy theories (again, backed by nine sources). These are far more than adequately sourced. I would additionally note that attempting to baselessly attack the same people you are trying to convince is not generally an effective way to make a request. Tollens (talk) 03:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Calling out media bias
why is it Wikipedia can call Fox,Newsmax and others right to far right biased media, but wont call out CNN,MSNBC many others as being left to far left media when it is clear of the bias that they have. They try to hide behind the notion that its disinformation, but in reality they just only air news that they consider as being what they consider as fact or they don't report it at all. The main stream media has reported just as many false claims as any other but they dont admit to it . Russian collusion,Hunters laptop and several others come to mind. Tmlowe65 (talk) 14:10, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- the way MSM reported on Russia and the laptop has been misrepresented by sources like Gateway Pundit soibangla (talk) 17:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- I have watched a read a lot of Msnbc an other main stream media news ,they either don't say anything or they just state what the white house response is. Many of the host state their opinions that are very left biased. Tmlowe65 (talk) 15:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Our opinions don't matter. O3000, Ret. (talk) 15:12, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Tell that to the news media. I just made a statement on what is or isn't stated in wikipedia. 47.4.72.120 (talk) 15:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Our opinions don't matter. O3000, Ret. (talk) 15:12, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- I have watched a read a lot of Msnbc an other main stream media news ,they either don't say anything or they just state what the white house response is. Many of the host state their opinions that are very left biased. Tmlowe65 (talk) 15:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Where does Wikipedia call Fox right or far right? I can't find that. Also, Wikipedia does not call Newsmax right or right-wing. WP says it has been variously described as conservative, right-wing, and far-right with numerous citations. O3000, Ret. (talk) 17:49, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- They use the term "conservative" for Fox and use term "described as ,right to far right" for Newsmax , but for CNN an MSNBC ,they just say " American news organization and political commentary...
- if you scroll down in controversies on CNN they have been only accused of being left biased. Tmlowe65 (talk) 14:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- We say what reliable sources say. We do not evaluate ourselves. And this has nothing to do with the subject of this article. O3000, Ret. (talk) 15:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class politics articles
- Unknown-importance politics articles
- Wikipedia requested images of politics
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Blogging articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Conservatism articles
- Unknown-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press