Talk:Thomas of Britain

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

King Arthur Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject King Arthur, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of King Arthur, the Arthurian era and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.King ArthurWikipedia:WikiProject King ArthurTemplate:WikiProject King ArthurKing Arthur articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Number of fragments

Actually, this is not as clear I thought. Wind says there are 8 but actually lists 9 - Cambridge, Douce, 2 Sneyd, 2 Turin, 3 Strasbourg; Hatto says there are 10. Plus the Carlisle fragment. So that gives between 9 and 11! --Pfold 17:24, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Anglo-Norman?"

Why is Thomas described unambiguously as "Anglo-Norman?" From A.T. Hatto's translation of Tristan:

"...Gottfried von Strassburg names him 'Thomas of Britain' in his Prologue. Gottfried uses 'Britain' both for Great and Little Britain (Brittany), so that it is not possible to demonstrate convincingly that he thought of Thomas as an Anglo-Norman, an Englishman, or a Breton. Nor does Thomas's French entirely decide the issue. In the opinion of Romance scholars, Thomas wrote in the literary French of the Angevin courts, but with traces of Anglo-Norman. This does not necessarily tell us anything about Thomas's origins, or even about where he was reared: but it agrees with what may be inferrred from his story about his service as a court poet, namely, that the circle for which he wrote had strong associations with England, with London, and with the Angevins."

I'll remove the reference to his origin/ethnicity until it can be established more conclusively with sourced material. zadignose (talk) 08:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can't simply revert this with no source, and proclaim that "his poem was Anglo-Norman, so he's an Anglo-Norman poet." First of all, as seen above, "traces of Anglo-Norman" don't make even the poem an Anglo-Norman poem. Second of all, it's deceptive to use the adjective to describe the poet, rather than the poem. So rephrase appropriately, if necessary, to describe the poem. I wouldn't change the Franz Kafka page to describe him as a "German author," simply because he wrote in German. His ethnicity is complex, and yet it's far more clear cut in terms of language, nationality, and ethnicity than Thomas, of whom "little is known." zadignose (talk) 10:04, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]