User talk:Tomlovesfar

This is Tomlovesfar's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

February 2024

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Avicii. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. MOS:DUPLINK second notice. TylerBurden (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Crypto Browser moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Crypto Browser. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade

Thank you for your feedback. I've added two sources, and I think that it is ready to be published as the topic is new and there are only a few research books and articles about this particular topic, so should I leave it as a draft or should I submit it for review? Tomlovesfar (talk) 03:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest submitting it for review. If it still needs extra work to meet Wikipedia's guidelines, the reviewer should let you know what you can do to improve it. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crypto Browser (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crypto Browser and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tomlovesfar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify

Hi Tomlovesfar, I noticed you moved Speedcubing and European BEST Engineering Competition to draft space but articles over 90 days old should not be draftified. You can read more at WP:Deletion policy#Incubation. S0091 (talk) 19:01, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing that out to me. Can you tell me how to handle certain articles that are either ads or contain original research? Of course I can flag it, but as you can see, a few posts like these have been flagged over the past year, and still nothing has changed. So is there anyway to remove a page like that?. Thank you once again Tomlovesfar (talk) 01:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A word of advice regarding speedy deletion

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you added an incorrect speedy deletion tag to Nirnaya Shrestha. Articles are only eligible for speedy deletion in a very limited set of circumstances, and the criterion you cited, WP:CSD#A3 is only valid if the article literally has no content. Since the article, or a previous version of it, makes a credible claim of significance it does not meet A7 either. Regards, decltype (talk) 14:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC) decltype (talk) 14:19, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]