User talk:Chrisallen87

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:TeleSuite System 3.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:TeleSuite System.jpg. The copy called Image:TeleSuite System.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 04:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ikake

A tag has been placed on Ikake, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gromlakh (talk) 21:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Misplaced page

Is the reason you want the "Managed Video as a Service" page deleted just because it has quotes in the title, or do you not want the page to go live at all? If you just want to change the title, you can move it ... provided it doesnt get deleted first. If so you can always re-create it with a proper name. —Soap— 15:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Though I note that Managed video as a service was deleted a few days ago. —Soap— 15:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Please do not use this site for promotion or advertising. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:15, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did happen to notice, but the article was very self-promotional and cited no third-party references. You may wish to check WP:CORP before creating an article on a company or corporation. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:26, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

+1s

Hi Chris. Adding +1s to old discussions without engaging with other editors' arguments as you did here and here is not constructive. Please consider reverting those additions and going forward, please avoid these kinds of comments. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 17:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? I engaged quite extensively, writing numerous paragraphs. Chrisallen87 (talk) 19:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I specifically meant the comments I linked above, not the new discussion you started. Robby.is.on (talk) 19:27, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These comments were closely related to my raised discussion, and constructive, in that, I am showing support for the other discussions that were made relatively recently on the very same point that I am raising again. It is clear that this very specific criticism of this article is being raised over and over and over, and I believe it is necessary to show support for the other discussions that were similar in nature. Chrisallen87 (talk) 20:33, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. tgeorgescu (talk) 19:04, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]