Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Frick Collection

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Bruxton (talk | contribs) at 17:27, 24 March 2024 (To Template:Did you know/Preparation area 6 (PSHAW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 17:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Frick Collection

Interior courtyard at the Frick Collection building
Interior courtyard at the Frick Collection building

Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 14:54, 14 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Frick Collection; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: GA from two days before nom. Looks good to me. Prefer ALT0 since I'm sure people will get what "namesake" means. ミラP@Miraclepine 18:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

  • It's not a case of knowing what "namesake" means, but wondering what it means here: ... that the Frick Collection is not allowed to lend out the Frick Collection's art?? Johnbod (talk) 00:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
  • @Johnbod: I know; I just forgot to be clear on that the first time. I actually considered while reviewing this nom that the redundancy behind the hook's meaning is what makes it the most interesting. ミラP@Miraclepine 23:26, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
    • Well, it doesn't work for me, I must say. Johnbod (talk) 02:33, 18 March 2024 (UTC)