Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayyur Girotra
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. A source review would have been very helpful in this discussion but none was provided by participants. But there is a consensus to Keep and no additional support for Deletion. I don't think a third relist would result in a clearer consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 05:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mayyur Girotra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to fail WP:GNG, there are some announcements kind of sources, routine coverage and non-independent interview, but I fail to see any real independent SIGCOV about the person. Tehonk (talk) 22:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 17. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:01, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and Delhi. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 00:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, England, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:34, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: When I searched for this person on many places (like: Google, Wing, Yandex, and DuckDuckGo), I found many news articles. Based on that, the subject is clearly passing WP:THREE. The article can be tagged to improve current sourcing though. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 11:00, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please show that WP:THREE, simply saying there are WP:GOOGLEHITS is not a valid argument. Tehonk (talk) 17:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Aha'n why not. Here are your WP:THREE. 1, 2, 3. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 15:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- 1 and 3 are just interviews so they are not independent. 2 could be OK. So I don't think this is passing THREE. I'll check the below sources later. Tehonk (talk) 03:57, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Aha'n why not. Here are your WP:THREE. 1, 2, 3. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 15:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please show that WP:THREE, simply saying there are WP:GOOGLEHITS is not a valid argument. Tehonk (talk) 17:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
I know 1 & 3 i gave are interviews but not everything in those interviews is solely from the subject. There's some independent text in there too, like the first paragraph. These sources are reliable and credible. Anyway, i found some additional sources that are secondary independent reliable that shows the subject's significance as a designer like [1], [2], [3] Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 14:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: The subject appears to be a notable designer. He is the only person from South Asia selected to kick off New York's prestigious LGBTQ+ Pride 2024, and he is among the only 14 designers to exhibit at the French European Fashion Week, which gained a lot of media attention. [4][5], [6], [7], [8] Various leading media houses extensively covered him. [9]. Google News Search yielded lots of hits from reliable secondary sources passing WP:BASIC. Wasilatlovekesy (talk) 15:34, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, seeking some feedback on the sources brought to this discussion (and any others that can be mentioned). It's not sufficient to say that you did a search and found sources, you must share what they are.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per sources provided above, passes WP:BASIC.Sk1728 (talk) 17:08, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per above. Actual analysis of sources would be quite helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:13, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- KEEP - Sufficient sources provided above by Youknowwhoistheman and Wasilatlovekesy . Twinkle1990 (talk) 09:36, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.