Talk:Glasses

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Glasses article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 90 days

Glasses was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 19, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
August 10, 2006	Good article reassessment	Delisted
July 27, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
September 15, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
June 16, 2009	Good article reassessment	Delisted
May 29, 2011	Good article reassessment	Not listed
Current status: Delisted good article

Fashion High‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Ophthalmology Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Ophthalmology task force (assessed as Top-importance).

‹See TfM›

Glass High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glass, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of glass on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlassWikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Taskforces/GlassTemplate:WikiProject Glassglass articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Made an edit on Joseph Needham and also Britannica info contradicts current wikipedia page

I made an edit earlier to correct what I find to be just misleading.

Joseph Needham was a scholar from many decades ago, with limited resources saying, and I quote “It has sometimes been stated that the invention of spectacles was Chinese. This (may, in part) have derived from a paper by Laufer. Digital page 152 https://web.archive.org/web/20160823000519/https://monoskop.org/images/7/70/Needham_Joseph_Science_and_Civilisation_in_China_Vol_4-1_Physics_and_Physical_Technology_Physics.pdf

He was clearly admitting speculation that some believed the Chinese made the spectacles because of one manuscript. He never even said that he knew that with full certainty that this manuscript was the very and entire reason why people were saying it.

Also, Britannica contradicts the Wikipedia article. It credits the earliest recorded comment on the use of lenses for optical purposes to Roger Bacon in 1268. Who was also the first European to describe in detail the process of making gunpowder. The Brtiannica also states that around 1268, "magnifying lenses inserted in frames were used for reading both in Europe and China at this time, and it is a matter of controversy whether the West learned from the East or vice versa".

Britannica typically askes updated actual experts in the field to write in their encyclopedia unlike Wikipedia, no offense. And so they are a very reliable and professional source so should the Britannica information about the early history of glasess be added in or not? https://www.britannica.com/science/eyeglasses 49.180.18.15 (talk) 04:25, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Where's the list of lense material types?

If there's a list of what materials are used typically for glasses frames, where's the list of typically used lense material ie glass, poly-carbonate. 101.182.26.66 (talk) 09:33, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paralipomena by Johannes Kepler

Hi everyone I saw a brief discussion about this document by Kepler. In this article I was wondering is there any brief documentation what this document is so important and what is the importance is in the field of optics in the 1500's?

thank you TeddyRooFan1! (talk) 23:09, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temples

There seems to be a contradiction in the article about the date of the introduction of temples, with the 18th century mentioned, but an El Greco in apparent contradiction to that.~~---- Richard Comaish (talk) 10:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction?

The subsections Yellow-tinted computer/gaming glasses and Blue-light blocking glasses appear to contradict each other. The former states these computer or gaming glasses can also filter out high energy blue and ultra-violet light from LCD screens. while the latter says However, there is no measurable UV light from computer monitors. (Discuss 0nshore's contributions!!!) 03:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]