Talk:Canada–India diplomatic row

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.

India

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

International relations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Excellently written article! Very strong sources, keep up the good work.

Noorullah (talk) 07:41, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restore

I restored the article per WP:CCC. Besides, no discussion has taken place here on the article's talk page since it's creation. Mfarazbaig (talk) 16:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mfarazbaig, what does "rea" mean? And I'm wondering if you actually looked at the close: "Later comments also pointed out this content is already appropriately covered on other pages", according to User:PARAKANYAA. Drmies (talk) 16:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"rea" was simply a typo error for the word 'revert'. FWIW, that discussion closed as No consensus and not 'Oppose'. I'm also wondering what other pages cover the Background and Reactions section for the Canada—India diplomatic row that numerous sources have covered and as such is notable enough to deserve a standalone article. Anyone who disagrees should take this article to the AfD or first seek a fresh and clear consensus for redirection. Mfarazbaig (talk) 16:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]