User talk:Kolya77

Moldova article

I didn't say "my" format was in the manual of style. Also, it is not my format, I did not make it. I'm just saying it is used in all national team articles I've seen (and I didn't add it to those pages). So just for the sake of consistency, I think it's reasonable to add it. Would you encourage different formats being used in each national team article? Seems really unnecessary to me. As you also can see, the new "format" isn't even a new format, it's the same format with three more columns. I don't see the reason for reverting it. If you're going to revert it, at least give me a good reason for doing it (which you haven't done).

You can remove the flags. I understand that, because the flags are only relevant for the nations participating in the knock-out rounds/finals. But how is the other information pointless? If it is so pointless, why is it used in practically all other national team articles, except this one? And if your reason for reverting is that "my" format is not in the MOS: Is your format in the MOS? No, it is not. So by your logic, your format is wrong too. Sørhaug (talk) 14:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No point to talk to much about this. Someone “John” created one format and you are adding it on every single page. And you find out straight away the respond in consistency. Please follow manuel of style and this is it. If its not on that page please respect the other people work. Have a nice dayKolya77 (talk) 14:20, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am adding it on every page? You are joking, right? I have only added it on one page (Moldova). And please show me how your version is manual of style, because I don't see it anywhere. And regarding respecting other people's work: Did you respect my work by reverting my edit? Let me remind you, I added three columns to the existing format in the article, and you call that disrespecting other people's work? Are you serious? Sørhaug (talk) 14:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I can revert your question. But did you respect my work by reverting my edit ? I have edited all this competitive records from the time they were most empty, with no updates for years. You came with your rules and ruined my work without following manuel of style ? Totally wrong that are you doing. About 3 columns you added (i suggest you to think how you can add few more on this your edits maybe yellow and red cards each team gets, to make this table extremely big for your satisfaction). Good day mate.Kolya77 (talk) 14:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting your edit? I reverted your edit to tell you the reasoning behind my edit, because you asked me what was wrong, so I responded... That's why I reverted it. What part of the article did I ruin? I would like to know. And I can say it again, I edited so it is in accordance with how the formatting is on other pages. That's it. It's not about my "satisfaction", it's about consistency. Sørhaug (talk) 14:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA Women's Champions League

Hi. you are correct about the colors, I was just trying to keep it consisted with the leagues that have more than one entry. Tomrtn (talk) 22:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Moldovan Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Văsieni. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moldova women's national football team

Hello. I don`t see any changes after Moldova loosing to Litwania by result 0-4. You changing only when Moldova winning or what? --Makenzis. 11:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022–23 Moldovan Liga 2 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2022–23 Moldovan Liga 2, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:40, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted change 2021–22 Moldovan Cup

Hi, despite the name changes they're same club. I don't know why but they keep changing name. Here check this 2021-22 season it's named as CF OGUZSPORT and 2022-23 season named as UNIVER-OGUZSPORT. ZeusAmmon1 (talk) 10:48, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

You might be right. Apologies. Kolya77 (talk) 10:49, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nicolae Bortă for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicolae Bortă is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolae Bortă until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:55, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022–23 Moldovan Cup

You say "Please follow manual of style" where on earth in manual of style does it say that the matches should be collapsbile? I'm just going based off of what most football articles do. And stop WP:OWNING the article, you can't just revert every change a user does to the page. That is disruptive. And also you broke WP:3RR, so you could be blocked for that if you don't be careful. Mwiqdoh (talk) 16:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kolya77, You were very quick to revert, but very slow to respond. I expect a response soon otherwise I will take this discussion to a more serious place. Mwiqdoh (talk) 14:19, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Călin Chirilov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Călin Chirilov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Călin Chirilov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:16, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 12:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for all this reverts yesterday, I realize that it was too much from my side , probably the best case was to just report it and wait for a decision from superior people. Once again, sorry.14:33, 22 October 2023 (UTC)14:33, 22 October 2023 (UTC)~~

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some bubble tea for you!

Congrats for entering Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of edits/5001–10000! Keep up your good work! Timothytyy (talk) 12:50, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unjustified reverts of Moldova U17

I dont understand what your problem is, and why you keep reverting back my edits, when they specifically source and cover the recent call-up for the future tournament in April 2024. If you keep sticking to your ways, I'd have to bring this up somewhere else. Consider yourself warned. Editor1722 (talk) 16:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mate, I ignore the fact that most of your edits are made with errors, unsourced and all you can do is ruin and make every page you visit worse and worse. For this specific case , development friendly whatever tournament is in the end of April, squad was not announce yet and etc. everything you do is low and cheap. Sorry to say this. Kolya77 (talk) 16:17, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you followed the sourced linked I attached, from the Moldovan Football Federation you can easily see the squad was announced. I'm not sure how long you've been editing on Wiki, but it seems you have gathered quite a few complaints on your page. So will build my case for a topic ban pretty easily. Have a good one, while it lasts :) Editor1722 (talk) 16:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Of course it’s sad to hear that you worried more about banning. But I wish you good luck anyway, get your life togheter mate. Kolya77 (talk) 16:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No need to remove your work. All I'm doing is adding relevant sections (Fixtures, coaches etc.) I'm not undoing your work in any way, just covering sections that are missing. At the end of the day we are both trying to improve the page, so lets keep it friendly. All the best to you. Editor1722 (talk) 17:26, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of covering European qualification matches which the only matter you are adding all sort of friendlies and some development tournaments which has no value. Anyway, it is that it is. All the best Kolya77 (talk) 17:54, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not ok, you added a friendly result in the head to head record for competitive matches only , why you ruin it?

This is not all time record for all matches friendlies and official . Kolya77 (talk) 19:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:12, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Assists

Please contribute at discussion here. --SuperJew (talk) 11:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:716F:5234:207B:85D1. I noticed that you recently removed all content from a page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:716F:5234:207B:85D1 (talk) 14:10, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]