Jump to content

Talk:Mumps

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 15:26, 10 July 2024 (Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 September 2020 and 11 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mell4143. Peer reviewers: Bettchlk618.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee

[edit]

What is the source of the citation of confirmed cases in 2006 at UWM? As of April 21, Wisconsin's Public Health Department says there are currently 17. See: http://www.dhfs.state.wi.us/News/PressReleases/2006/04242006mumps.pdf

Thread relating to mumps edits

[edit]

Archived

Source(s) re: Dalhousie?

[edit]

Curious to know where the figure of "350 confirmed cases" came from in the Dalhousie University portion. Dalhousie is claiming only 82 cases as of 7/26/07 (http://healthservices.dal.ca/Mumps%20Prevention/mumps_dal.php). No source cited...


UK Advice Recommending Against Vaccination

[edit]

There is no link supporting the statement that mumps vaccination was recommended against by UK bodies until 1987 (???). Possibly this is a misunderstanding of the fact that no single mumps vaccination was approved in the UK until 1988. Mumps vaccination was normally delivered as part of MMR. This left parents who preferred the application of standalone vaccinations with no option to vaccinate against mumps. Can someone who is an authority (or at least has more information than me), either remove this bizarre claim or substantiate it with a source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.108.87.14 (talk) 00:37, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a source[1]. Tornado chaser (talk) 03:41, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Problem with that source is 1) it is primary 2) we contained the content before the source did so could simple be copied from use. 3) never heard of that journal. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:21, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have updated with a better ref. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:28, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, sorry that I didn't look into the source more. Tornado chaser (talk) 21:54, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]