Talk:Parody advertisement

Comedy Mid‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Energizer vs. Eveready

After talking about Energizer and the Energizer Bunny, it says "In an ironic twist, in 1991, Eveready Battery Company...".

Are Everready and Energizer related then? Or is this a mistake? - Jax

Energizer used to be known as Eveready Battery Company, which Energizer brand batteries being made by them but then later they where sold and their name was later changed to Energizer Holdings. See [1] --Cab88 01:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Confused

Parody advertisement#Hustler conflicts with itself (he was awarded /wasn't entitled to damages for invasion of privacy and emotional distress) and with Hustler Magazine v. Falwell ($350,000 vs $200,000). — Omegatron 01:16, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ineligilbe Beer

What about the "Ineligible Beer" commercials with the referee calls? I think it was Budweiser who did it, replacing Miller Lite with Bud Lite. Miller responded with their version where, after having their beer replaced, the drinkers chased the refs because they "didn't want that beer".

Simpsons v. Burger King

This "suing" does not seem to exist. Burger King made several legitimate Simpsons commercials, and a Google Search turns up nothing. The section also has no source. If no one has an objection, I will remove this. --Jedravent 23:02, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Falwellhustler.jpg

The image Image:Falwellhustler.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:24, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]