Talk:Wargasm

Wargasm is currently a Music good article nominee. Nominated by Laun chba ller at 10:42, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)

Note: Co-nominated with Georgeykiwi and Issan Sumisu

Short description: British electronic rock duo

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

STOLEN BAND NAME!

They stole their name from a boston metal band from the 80s. Even their logo for a minute. Any quick google search will show you the real WARGASM 2601:192:8880:50A0:ECEE:9045:453:A013 (talk) 23:53, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from their bandcamp page at [1]https://wargasmboston.bandcamp.com/

WARGASM was a 3-piece Metal band, active from 1985 - 1995. The band released several demos, three albums, one E.P., one concert DVD, and toured Europe several times.

Wargasm are considered a Thrash Metal band, and their debut album 'Why Play Around?' is widely viewed by as a classic of the genre.

Wargasm are in the process of re-issuing their catalog for digital download and on CD & LP.

They can also be found on Facebook at [2]https://www.facebook.com/WARGASMwpa 24.56.7.116 (talk) 03:29, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Two bands coming up with the same name is no proof of theft. This is just an empty accusation and so why should it be made part of the article? Nikolai508 (talk) 21:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The earliest uses of the word in print I can find are referencing a practice by the Weather Underground organization in 1969. The word is not unique, and bands from different countries have the same name all the time.

The only thing I could think would be relevant to this is that US releases of this Wargasm's work use the name Wargasm (UK). Might be worth a mention if someone has a good source to reference it. Radioswede (talk) 18:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Music Style and Influences

They're clearly a digital hardcore band, but this section just waffles on about all the genre's they don't quite fit. 82.15.221.92 (talk) 18:36, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree they play digital hardcore but on Wikipedia we need WP:RELIABLESOURCES to backup the info. I've yet to find one which calls them it, and I've searched extensively. Issan Sumisu (talk) 19:45, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page development

Hey @Launchballer, got this page here which could do with some updating / improving, you could definitely end up being eligible for nominating it for GA if you take the majority edit! George (talk) 15:32, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't have thought this be that far off, it just needs finetuning, which I can do. According to WP:GAN/I, nominators must have contributed significantly to the article, and according to the link on that page, this seems to have been primarily written by yourself and @Issan Sumisu: - I'd check with them first.--Laun chba ller 16:05, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm admittedly not knowledgeable on GA submissions, what's the question for me? Issan Sumisu (talk) 17:36, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per that page's Step 1, "If you are not a significant contributor to the article, secure the consent of the significant contributors before nominating." In other words, do you object to George nominating this?--Laun chba ller 17:40, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't object, go ahead. Issan Sumisu (talk) 19:55, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Man, this one took ages. There was an awful lot of content that didn't quite check out and a significant amount of WP:PROSELINE, hopefully what I've done has taken some of the edge off. Thanks for picking up on my errors as I went. Incidentally, Dead!, Way and Matlock almost certainly deserve their own articles - the first two per WP:GNG, Matlock per WP:MUSICBIO#C6 - and I plan on rolling out Dead! and Matlock in the week immediately following this passing its GA (so I can roll it out as a DYK triple-hook). At some point, I'll also see if there are 5x expansions in Lapdance (song) and Smack a Bitch, though I won't do either immediately.--Laun chba ller 11:11, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, the article looks incredible! Yeah, I had thought about them being able to have their own articles too, (DYK triple hook could be proper sick). Hopefully we can get this article passed and will obviously help you (along with every other article we've nominated together) with suggested improvements once it finally gets round to being reviewed! Teamwork really does make the dream work! George (talk) 18:57, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]