Talk:Vladimir Arutyunian

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

There is nothing in this article about any possible motives for his actions. Does anyone know anything about this? Academic Challenger 23:26, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly what I was thinking. I just found out about this assassination attempt but every article I've read completely ignores why the attempt was made. That's some very important missing information. 142.161.78.154 23:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your kidding right? There are so many reasons for it that I consider him a martyr (just look at some reasons (note: pretzels do not count for martyrdom status in my book, but if they did I would say god bless you pretzel every night before going to bed)). However, it would be nice to know that he didn't just do it because he didn't like the color of someones suit, but I find that just as unlikely as the major news corporations do and therefore I propose that they consider the answer to be obvious to every one on the face of the planet who has ever heard of gwbush, Iraq, and secret cia torture facilities. Yet given the possibility of insanity this must be considered among other examples of crappy semi-non-existent american journalism by the major infotainment conglomerates. --ANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE 22:34, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name spelling / Article spelling

I propose both articles be merged into a Vladimir Arutyunian page - which is the spelling the FBI uses, and as an Armenian I think better reflects the transliteration of the name than Arutinian. --RaffiKojian 02:57, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

pity he didnt succeed

god bless you good sir! (unless you don't believe in that sort of thing; in which case: good day good sir (or madam/you/thing/extra-dimensional-inraspacial-entity/GOD/incomprehensible sentience beyond human understanding/non-sentient-non-deterministic-event/...)!)

oh and if you are an extra-dimensional-inraspacial-entity you probably have no concept of "day" in which case I can only say have a good existence , unless of course your an incomprehensible-sentience-beyond-human-understanding wherein existence itself is undefined (which is itself incomprehensible from my point of view) in which case I probably have nothing to say to you beyond "I agree". --ANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE 11:43, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Though I do not condone his methods and negligent behavior with regards to civilian life, including the death of the Georgian Ministry of Internal Affairs agent (unless he was considered the "enemy" or if he was insane in which case I do not condone his insanity... but there is not much I can say about that...). I believe a far more effective method would of been to use one of the 19 types of assault weapons that Bush now allows by letting an assault gun ban expire. It just adds that ironic touch to it, plus they are more effective/accurate (I assume) and avoid secondary civilian casualties. --ANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE 12:21, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]