This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
First of all, since when is a nom for speedy deletion considered vandalism? Second, why did you remove the unreferenced tag without adding any references? Where are the references? You don't remove an unreferenced tag without adding any references. Your sweeping edits without explanation or good reason are themselves vandalism.
Unless you can improve the article, you will leave the speedy delete tag in place and allow an admin to decide whether this article should stand. And until you can add references you will allow the unreferenced tag to stay.
I might be inclined to take this a tad bit more seriously, if the person making these value judgments about the merit of this article were posting under an actual user name, instead of a random I.P. address. Tiger Tyson is a well known porn star, who is recognized in his industry. For anyone to claim that this article isn’t notable is not only ignorant, but hypocritical, as there are hundreds of other articles on Wikipedia subjected around other porn stars; yet I don’t see you on a crusade to get any of them removed. Quite frankly, your whole campaign to have this article deleted is insignificant, ridiculous, petty…and yes, it does reek of masked vandalism. - Jtpop14:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
