Jump to content

Black Sea deluge hypothesis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 74.248.1.85 (talk) at 03:33, 16 August 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Black Sea deluge is a hypothesized prehistoric flood that occurred when the Black Sea rapidly filled. The theory made headlines when The New York Times published it in December 1996.

Flood theory and regional geology

Black Sea today (light blue) and in 5600 BC (dark blue) according to Ryan's and Pitman's hypotheses.

In 1998, William Ryan and Walter Pitman, geologists from Columbia University, published evidence that a massive flood through the Bosporus occurred about 5600 BC. Glacial meltwater had turned the Black and Caspian Seas into vast freshwater lakes, while sea levels remained lower worldwide. The fresh water lakes were emptying their waters into the Aegean Sea. As the glaciers retreated, rivers emptying into the Black Sea reduced their volume and found new outlets in the North Sea, and the water levels lowered through evaporation. Then, about 5600 BC, as sea levels rose, Ryan and Pitman suggest, the rising Mediterranean finally spilled over a rocky sill at the Bosporus. The event flooded 60,000 mile² (155,000 km²) of land and significantly expanded the Black Sea shoreline to the north and west. Ryan and Pitman wrote:

"Ten cubic miles [42 km³] of water poured through each day, two hundred times what flows over Niagara Falls. …The Bosporus flume roared and surged at full spate for at least three hundred days."

Countering the hypothesis is a vast amount of data collected by Ukrainian and Russian scientists, for example the extensive research of Valentina Yanko-Hombach, a geology professor of Odessa State University, Ukraine. These findings predate the publication of the Black Sea deluge hypothesis, which highlights the problem of language barriers faced by western scientists dealing with scientific literature of the former Eastern Bloc.

The Black Sea deluge hypothesis ignores several facts apparent in the Russian language literature. Yanko-Hombach had shown previously that the water flow through the Bosporus reversed at certain geological times, depending on the water level of the Aegean Sea relative to the Black Sea. This contradicts the catastrophic breakage of a Bosporus sill on which Ryan and Pitman base their hypothesis. Likewise, the water levels calculated by Yanko-Hombach were by a wide margin different than those hypothesized by Ryan and Pitman.

In 2006, Yanko-Hombach, now president of the Avalon Institute of Applied Science in Winnipeg, Canada, has published a scientific volume featuring 35 papers by an international group of Black Sea scientists, including her own research on this topic.[1] The book makes a lot of the early Russian research available in English for the first time, and combines it with more recent scientific findings.

At this time (2006), a cross-disciplinary research project lead by Yanko-Hombach and funded by UNESCO and the International Union of Geological Sciences, is still continuing.[2]

The review of sediments in the Black Sea in 2004 by a pan-European project (Assemblage – Noah Project) confirmed the conclusion of Pitman and Ryan. Furthermore, calculations made by Mark Siddall predicted an underwater canyon that was actually found.

Archaeology

Although neolithic agriculture had by that time already reached the Pannonian plain, the authors link its spread with people displaced by the postulated flood. More recent examinations by oceanographers such as Teofilo A. "Jun" Abrajano Jr at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and his Canadian colleague Ali Aksu of Memorial University of Newfoundland have cast some doubt on this catastrophic flood theory. Abrajano's team, finding sapropel mud deposits in the Sea of Marmara, have concluded that there has been sustained interaction between the Mediterranean and the Black Sea for at least 10,000 years:

"For the Noah's Ark Hypothesis to be correct, one has to speculate that there was no flowing of water between the Black Sea and the Marmara Sea before the speculated great deluge. We have found this to be incorrect."

In a series of expeditions, a team of marine archeologists led by Robert Ballard identified what appeared to be ancient shorelines, freshwater snail shells, drowned river valleys, tool-worked timbers, and man-made structures in roughly 300 feet (100 m) of water off the Black Sea coast of modern Turkey. Radiocarbon dating of freshwater mollusk remains indicated an age of about 7,000 years.

According to a report in New Scientist magazine (4 May 2002, p. 13), the researchers found an underwater delta south of the Bosporus. There was evidence for a strong flow of fresh water out of the Black Sea in the 8th millennium BC.

The review of sediments in the Black Sea coming from a series of expeditions carried out from 1998 to 2005, firstly in the frame of a collaborative project between France (Ifremer[3]) and Romania (GeoEcoMar[4]), then followed by a pan-European project (Assemblage[5]) coordinated by Gilles Lericolais,[6] confirmed the conclusion of Pitman and Ryan. These results were also completed by the Noah project led by the IOBAS Bulgarian institute. Furthermore, calculations made by Mark Siddall predicted an underwater canyon that was actually found.

The hypothesis remains an active subject of debate among archaeologists.

Other post-Ice Age deluges

Further information: Deluge (prehistoric)

As the Ice Age retreated, other basins refilled as sea levels rose. Some refilled too slowly to be perceptible in a human life-span, such as the Aegean Basin which presents no defined sill to be breached. Others must have refilled rapidly, in cases where a sill was breached. A comparable refilling in the region of the Near East was the refilling of the flat basin of the lower Tigris-Euphrates that is now occupied by the Persian Gulf.

Identifications with Other Flood Accounts

The proposed deluge has been connected with various Great Flood myths, notably Noah's Flood.

Hershel Shanks, editor of the Biblical Archaeology Review, said that "all modern critical Bible scholars regard the tale of Noah as legendary. There are other flood stories, but if you want to see the Black Sea flood in Noah's flood, who's to say no?"

Fundamentalist Christians claimed that "Noah's Flood was not a local flood in the Black Sea area, but a world-wide flood that has left its mark on every continent on this planet",[7] and that the timing was wrong.

Sources

  • John Noble Wilford, "Geologists Link Black Sea Deluge to Farming's Rise," The New York Times, December 17, 1996, pp. B5 and B13.
  • W.B. Ryan and W.C. Pitman, Noah's Flood: The new scientific discoveries about the event that changed history 1998
  • Ian Wilson. Before the Flood: Understanding the Biblical Flood Story as Recalling a Real-Life Event. (Orion Books 336 pages. ISBN 0-75284-635-3)

Notes

  1. ^ V. Yanko-Hombach et al., The Black Sea Flood Question: Changes in Coastline, Climate and Human Settlement (Springer, 2007, 971 pages) ISBN-10 1-4020-4774-6
  2. ^ IGCP 521: Black Sea-Mediterranean Corridor during the last 30 ky: sea level change and human adaptation accessed Dec 2006
  3. ^ http://www.ifremer.fr
  4. ^ http://www.geoecomar.ro
  5. ^ http://www.ifremer.fr/assemblage
  6. ^ http://www.ifremer.fr/drogm/Perso/lericolais
  7. ^ "Proof of Noah's Flood at the Black Sea?". Answers in Genesis. Retrieved 2006-03-08.

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Sea_deluge_hypothesis&oldid=151531951"