Talk:Peter Reith
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
Biography Unassessed | |||||||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.Australia: Politics B‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Cleanup
The article needs a fair bit of work. it doesn't read very well and there is quite a bit of additional information that could be added, including the two links below.Wikicanfixit 09:23, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding the infobox. Reith was not just Minister for Defence. Wikipeterproject 07:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- the link to PM Howard Press Release, 17 February, 2002, access date 30 January, 2007, could not be found on 04 March 2007 Mickiewiki 09:18, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
I have added links to examples of "criticism from unions and ALP" to satisfy "Citation Needed" tag and removed the tag. --HKL47 03:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Possible Wiki Links
I am currently testing an automated Wikipedia link suggester. Here are the results of running it on this article:
- Can link Minister for Defence: ...overnment from 2001 to 2004. As Minister for Defence, he was provided Howard with what was l...
- Can link election campaign: ...childen overboard" during the 2001 election campaign. He has been widely accused of lying ab...
Notes: The article text has not been changed in any way; Some of these links may be wrong, some may be right; You can leave positive feedback or negative feedback; Please feel free to delete this section from the talk page. -- Nickj 04:34, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Telephone Affair
Why is the reference to the Telephone affair being removed after replacement? There is nothing libelous about it; it is documented; it is factual. The original sentence was simple, clear, neutral, and referenced. Later replacements were not quite so neutral, but their removal should have been discussed here.
I note that in all cases the edits were made by an unnamed editor. Is this one of the self-serving edits made Australian Government employees?
I am going to re-insert the original wording. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HKL47 (talk • contribs) 02:20, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Unassessed biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- B-Class Australian politics articles
- Low-importance Australian politics articles
- WikiProject Australian politics articles
- WikiProject Australia articles