User talk:TigerK 69

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Archives

1, 2, 3

Fact Checking: The Beer Song

I noticed that you added the entry on DVDA (band) identifying ‘The Beer Song’ as originating with DVDA. I have been searching for hours trying to verify this. I was wondering what your source was. Thank you.—David Regev 05:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't really add any of those songs to the list. I just merged the List of DVDA songs with DVDA (band).

Image:Robert_Plant_Victoria_Concert.jpg

I have tagged Image:Robert_Plant_Victoria_Concert.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 21:37, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Hope i could get your support here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:WW2InfoBox#The_new_image

and here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:World_War_II#The_new_image

Because i belive that you will agree with me that having the Normandi battle picture in the size of two, and not having a picture of the Stalingrad battle in a world war two image is absurd. M.V.E.i. 11:13, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Carl.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Carl.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 21:30, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox cleanup?

I moved this discussion to the talkpage of {{nowrap begin}} since I think it is of public interest. --David Göthberg 20:03, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Soul Caliber

Please see our fiction guidelines: WP:FICT and WP:WAF; those are the two things all fiction articles must follow. Those characters have no chance of following them because they lack any possibility of Secondary information. There is no way to have a discussion over them because even if twenty people want to keep them, they have to go. Please don't even try to argue that they are notable or anything like that. Secondary information defines notability and these characters don't have any possibility of having any at all. Just to remind you again, discussion and consensus are null and void in this case, so please don't even suggest it. TTN 20:29, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing in either of those guidelines that implies that any discussion and consensus are null and void for deletion and merging of fiction articles. In fact, it says that "Non-notable information should be deleted only when all other options have been exhausted." Which means that first there must be an attempt to make a fiction article more notable by adding real-life information. if that is not the case, then it should be considered for deletion only if a consensus is reached, according to WP:CONS. —TigerK 69 03:20, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The guidelines aren't supposed to explain that. Using my rational, you should be able to see why there cannot be any real discussion other than an "Oh, we'll make you feel like your opinion counts, but then revoke it due to the fact that it unfortunately doesn't matter" discussion. This isn't deletion; this is merging and redirecting, which is a middle ground option. Deletion means that the information is no longer available. The articles can always be revived, and the important information still exists. Again, unless someone actually provides a hint of real world information, there is not an option for discussion, as WP:ILIKEIT opinions don't count. TTN 22:19, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mort and Muriel.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mort and Muriel.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:13, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

A discussion is held in the Axis powers of World War II article talk page. I oppose USSR being in the Controversial cases of relations with the Axis section, while some others support it being in the section. Feel free to state your personal opinion here. M.V.E.i. 18:53, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Soulcalibur (film)

I'd like to suggest that you merge the content at Soulcalibur (film) to Soulcalibur. Per the notability guidelines for films, films should not have their own stand-alone articles until they enter production. This is because delays can happen in development. See how Spider-Man 4 and Jurassic Park IV are merged to see how the same can be done here. If you have any questions, let me know! —Erik (talk • contrib) - 23:08, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good work! Soul series is an even better place to put it -- same thing was done for Metal Gear Solid (film). I added a disambiguation link to Soulcalibur in case someone was trying to find coverage about the film. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 23:28, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also thought that the movie shouldn't have its own article yet since it's not even listed on IMDB. —TigerK 69 23:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Brian Griffin.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Brian Griffin.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WP:FG

Thanks for joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Family Guy! If you haven't already, please add Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Family Guy to your watchlist so you can participate in talk page conversations. We could use a few volunteers for some tasks, tho participation on that level is not strictly required.

You are encouraged to add our userbox to your User page: {{User WikiProject Family Guy}}

Current special projects

Family Guy Reference Desk (WP:FGdesk) – this proposed project that needs a few more members to get going. This goal is to engineer a team of evil monkeys who answer "forum" questions about Family Guy, either at the Reference Desk, at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Entertainment, or by moving questions mistakenly asked on article Talk pages. If the monkeys don't work out, we'd have volunteer editors handle this, but tell everyone outside the WikiProject it's monkeys. That sounds much cooler.

Again, thanks for your interest. We hope you will enjoy it here. / edg ☺ ★ 06:34, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Angels Tactics.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Angels Tactics.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:40, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kuban Cossacks discussion

There's an argument in the Kuban Cossacks article talk page. Feel free to state your opinion here. M.V.E.i. 19:14, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Fifth Element soundtrack.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Fifth Element soundtrack.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:56, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mort and Muriel.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mort and Muriel.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:56, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Missed by a Dollar.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Missed by a Dollar.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:36, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter

The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 00:09, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mort and Muriel.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mort and Muriel.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As i understood you are Russian so...

Could you please help with the Russian martial arts thing?

I will tell you the problems:

1. Russian martial arts article needs referencing, and i couldn't find thise.

2. There are articles about martial arts in Russian that need to be translated to English. After translated to English, they also need to be referenced and expanded (the demends on the English Wikipedia are higher). Those articles are: [1], [2], [3].

If you can't do that, then please leave that messege to someone who can help here. Thank you. PocketMoon 17:25, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]