User talk:Parsifal

Parsifal is on extended wikibreak. Talk page message response will be delayed.

Emails are welcome for quicker communications.
Click here to send Parsifal an email.

Friday 12 July
19:53 UTC

(Purge Server Cache)

;Welcome...

Some discussions work better kept together on one page,

— so please watch this page for my reply if you post here.

— and I'll watch your page for your reply if I post a message there.

Some messages work better with the new message alert, so you're welcome to reply here to my post on your page if you prefer.

Thanks! Parsifal

Template:Multicol

Template:Multicol-break

Archives

Archive 1 (thru 31 August 2007)
Archive 2 (1 Sept 2007 and on ...)

Template:Multicol-end

post new messages here (use email if time-sensitive)

Bummer

Thanks for the reply, Parsifal. I remain interested in your thoughts, Albion has made a couple good points for me. I understand your time constraints, so thanks. Eaglizard 18:34, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Successful RfA - Thank you!

Thank you for supporting my recent RfA. It was successful, and I was promoted to Administrator today. I appreciate the support! — KieferSkunk (talk) — 23:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Message

Today in an active discussion I referred to an archived thread on which you'd posted in May—letting you know in case there are unintended consequences. (Old news: no, I still can't see that Edwardian font on Wikipedia, but it doesn't bother me any more ;-) — Athaenara ✉ 15:25, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. I made those comments carefully and stand by what I wrote, so, no worries. That font mystery is so strange, oh well... - I can see it on your old signatures, but not your recent ones. Good to hear from you, and best wishes. --Parsifal _Hello 23:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikistalking

I do not want to assume bad faith, but I have reason to believe you have been Wikistalking my posts.

This is a friendly warning to stop such behaviour. If I am mistaken, I am sorry. 122.49.135.245 00:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC) — Preceding comment signed as by 122.49.135.245 (talk · contribs) actually added by Jun kaneko (talk · contribs) [reply]

Since you don't want to assume bad faith, you could try not assuming bad faith. --Parsifal _Hello 00:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disruption of Dir en grey

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please read the Wikipedia guidelines regarding what should be included in a lead paragraph. Although, I'm assuming your motives are less about improving the article, and more about "proving a point" Please make your edits in a more mature manner Parsifal. The billboard references is not really reputable, although the chart positions can be particular noteworthy. Saguy1982 23:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ignore your personal attacks for now. Thanks for providing additional evidence of your sockpuppetry.

In what way is a Billboard Magazine article not be reputable? --Parsifal _Hello 23:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, don't you dare accuse me of sock puppetry! None of your contributions on the talk page were helpful in any manner, you posted only to insult my edits, providing no rationale for such actions. For someone that claims to have little interest on the topic, you clearly seem to have zealotry in this. The billboard reference provides no real contribution to the article, even though you worded it as "according to" the chart positions can be a great worth, in a proper section of the article. They are not suitable for the lead. Start behaving in a mature manner Parsifal. One can easily accuse of being a sockpuppet of Cyrus XIII. Saguy1982 00:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]