User talk:HisSpaceResearch/Archive 5

Thanks

Thanks for the help! Russe304 16:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

In reply to Allanaquoich - I have a particular interest in Mar Lodge Estate - and feel it worth the while to expand on its place names etc. - I've found it to be a very interesting place. WikiWriter 11:28, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

paki shop

restored - I've removed the CSD tags. ELIMINATORJR 17:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Supercentenarian trackers

Perhaps this could be renamed, but I find it quite odd that the person who nominated this for deletion suggested an article instead. Even if an article were made, the main purpose of the 'category' is to 'categorize' and link articles that are related in certain aspects.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_November_1#Category:Supercentenarian_trackers

Ryoung122 02:18, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Embarassed cough

Sorry. Honestly I didn't think to check the edit history on the Emma Tatham AFD. So I am genuinely sorry for any misplaced crotchety-ness on my part, and I admit there might have been some. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 03:42, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

• Just thinking about it. What I'll do is strike but not delete my reply to your (not a) vote and explain, in suitably embarrassed terms, on the AFD. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 03:56, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

User:NEMT

Hi. I've reported this user twice to WP:ANI in the past with absolutely no effect. Look at his contribution history and talk page to see why. He delves into puerile vandalism every now and then such as creating inappropriate redirects or adding inappropriate content. Perhaps a new voice will have more effect? If you do report him then thanks for trying. Cheers. Zunaid©® 08:20, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Tagging mistakes

You marked both Judge Lubbie Harper, Jr. and Judge Thomas A. Bishop for speedy deletion as copyright violations G12 - but didn't say what they were violations of, which made the tag unhelpful. I checked the history and saw that the original authors had blanked the page, so they could be deleted under WP:CSD#G7. The correct tag to use when the original author has blanked the page is {{Db-author}}. GRBerry 14:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LandCockayne.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LandCockayne.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Murder of Arlene Fraser

Murder of Arlene Fraser, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Murder of Arlene Fraser satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Arlene Fraser and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Murder of Arlene Fraser during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 11:23, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Feeder

Sure thing, thanks a lot for editing :).Marcus Bowen 14:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Internet as a source of prior art

Please see Talk:Internet as a source of prior art#There.27s too much jargon here for a general readership. Thanks. --Edcolins 20:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

No Body Modficiation tag

It's an expression of an opinion. How is saying one is repulsed by body modification any different from saying one is repulsed by smoking? --Scottandrewhutchins 14:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I guess you're right. I am not offended by the tag myself (I would lean towards being repulsed by body modification as well) but I could see it being contentious, and divisive and/or inflammatory as it singles out something that people do and says "I can't stand that", so promotes intolerance in a sense. However it is still just an opinion.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 14:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juggs

I expanded the article as promised. Want to look again? --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 14:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Admin

Hi. I'd like to nominate you as an admin, as I think you're qualified. Let me know if you're interested. Epbr123 15:35, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey there. You may wish to consider withdrawing and resubmitting yourself at a later point as your RfA does not appear to have much chance of succeeding. I also made a note about this at WP:BN. User:Veesicle 07:23, 12 November 2007 (UTC)