Jump to content

Talk:Porky Pig

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Amcaja (talk | contribs) at 00:28, 17 December 2007 (→‎Blue Christmas: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Was Porky the original Looney Tunes character?

Looks like "Bosko" was the first character according to here

http://www.agsprint.com/~ktappe/wb/ David de Paoli


That's right: The insipid "Bosko", of "Sinkin' in the Bathtub", 1930.

[1]

Porky *was*, however, the original Looney Tunes star, defined as an actor who draws audience just by name power. --Steverapaport

"Bosko" was basically a Mickey Mouse knockoff. He also looked a lot like someone wearing "blackface" makeup. So he was a loser on several fronts. Wahkeenah 10:48, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Porcine Pig?

I was wondering about that myself. It turns out Porky was listed that way in the 1996 movie "Space Jam". Unless someone can demonstrate that name was used in the classic WB cartoons, I think it should stay permanently out of the article. Wahkeenah 23:47, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Porky gag film

I removed this bit:

A very short black-and-white cartoon from sometime in the late 1930s or 1940s, presumably intended as an in-house gag, was shown on the Warner Bros. 50th Anniversary TV show, illustrating the relaxation of language constraints over the years. Porky is on a rooftop, nailing shingles, when he smacks his thumb with the hammer. Grimacing in pain, he cries, "Son of a bi-bi-bi-, son of a bi-bi-bi-, son of a bi-bi-bi-... gun!" He then turns to the camera, drops his stutter, and says, "You thought I was going to say 'son of a bitch', didn't you?!"

This little cartoon gets mentioned here every once in a while. I'm inclined to see it as mere trivia; why does it belong in the article? But this particular paragraph on it is troubling more for its original research. The word "presumably" is a red flag, and the bit "illustrating the relaxation of language constraints over the years" seems to be an interpretation that is not backed up with a source citation. For the moment, I've moved the paragraph here. — Amcaja (talk) 05:21, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you have a problem with this. It was on the WB 50th Anniversary Show as well as the videotape they sold of that show. You don't like "presumably"? Well, take it out. That's speculation, but the rest is factual. "Son of a bitch" was not permitted in films in those days, as you well know about the problems they had just getting "I don't give a damn" into Gone With the Wind. But even without those obvious facts, it's an interesting insight into how the WB cartoonists would amuse themselves. However, I'm guessing you don't think this thing actually exists. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 06:41, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And now that I've seen it on YouTube (hey, that took all of 30 seconds to find) the description is not totally accurate, but the essence of it is true. [2] And I'm guessing your next complaint is about "copyright violation". There are always "policies" to hide behind when the real reason is that you just "don't like it." Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 06:44, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why are you being so defensive? The paragraph sites no sources whatsoever and is trivia. That's why I "don't like it." — Amcaja (talk) 09:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The source cited wasn't acceptable per Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Who is this person? Is he a recognized expert on animation history? Does he have an editor or other oversight? Also, the Hays stuff is still speculation unless a source is sited. And I know what the Hays Code was, thank you. — Amcaja (talk) 13:42, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Then you know very well that profanity was not allowed under the Hays rules. Do I need a source that 2 + 2 = 4? Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 16:02, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What cracks me up is that Porky, for perhaps the first time, is able to say something completely stutter-free! How interesting! — Cinemaniac 19:28, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
He does stutter a little bit on "say", but he gets the important words out with no problem. The amazing thing, perhaps, is that Blanc was able to do a perfectly convincing stutter without having a speech impediment himself. Not everyone can do that. That's why they paid Mel the big bucks. In fact, they apparently wrote him a Blanc check. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 19:30, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What needs a (reliable) source is the date of the film, even a speculative date of the film. If you can find something form Jerry Beck or Charles Solomon or Michael Barrier or any of a half-dozen other respected animation historians, that states that the film was made and shown during the Hays era, that would be fine. I'm just wary of trusting some guy's personal webpage/blog. — Amcaja (talk) 23:30, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That's certainly understandable. But, if I remember amazon.com correctly, the Looney Tunes Golden Collection: Volume 4 contains this short blooper as one of its bonus features. (I myself was unfortunately not able to get that volume, and I have yet to acquire the fifth one. But also from what I know, that gag film has been released on a few other DVDs as well.) Maybe if we cite that the cartoon is available on the fourth Looney Tunes Golden Collection volume... Will that be a good enough reliable source?
Regarding the date: If memory serves me right, the gag film was made in either 1938 or 1939. I'll try and obtain the exact date of the film by asking Jerry Beck or Michael Barrier, or by going to http://cartoonbrew.com , or by simply searching on Google. —Cinemaniac 23:59, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well... A quick Google search warranted these answers: A) A film including this blooper film of Porky's was released in West Germany on March 29, 1985; B) The intentional blooper was released on The Looney Tunes Golden Collection: Volume 4 under the title Porky's Breakdowns; and C) The gag reel was also included in a bonus feature on a recent DVD set of Warner Bros. 1939 film Each Dawn I Die; the special feature's title was Breakdowns of 1939, a blooper reel released around that time. Breakdowns of 1939 featured, interestingly, the Merrie Melodies opening theme song (Merrily We Roll Along) during the opening credits . — Cinemaniac 01:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Good work! Let's cite either the Golden Collection DVD (presuming it includes a date for the short), or the Each Dawn I Die DVD as the source where the date of the film is given. Of course, it would be best if one of us actually viewed the DVD in person first, but I can't do that from Japan very easily without a long ordering process.
The whole article is pretty much unsourced, I notice. This is my fault; I wrote most of this stuff waaaay back when Wikipedia was still new and there were no source citation guidelines. It's mostly from Schneider's That's All Folks!! if I remember correctly. — Amcaja (talk) 04:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Slight mistake on my part: The song playing over the opening credits of the Breakdowns reels is The Merry-Go-Round Broke Down, NOT Merrily We Roll Along. How I got that edit wrong, I dunno. — Cinemaniac 12:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Outstanding, nonetheless. And good for you for doing the work instead of bickering about it (note to self). :) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 01:59, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Christmas

Am I missing something? Why is an Elvis Christmas song relevant to Porky Pig? — Amcaja (talk) 00:28, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]