User talk:Indubitably

_{This page looks best in Mozilla Firefox.}

“

Women who seek to be equal with men lack ambition.

”

— Joseph Danek

					Subpages
User	Awards	BRC	Notebook	Contribs	Subpages	E-mail

LaraLove (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

*READ THIS FIRST OR YOUR MESSAGE MAY BE IGNORED*
^{Probably not, but read it anyway.}

If you leave a message here, I'll reply here. If I've left you a message, you can reply there or here. If you chose to reply here, I will respond here.
If you are pissed off at something I've done, assume good faith. Most likely, whatever I did was with the best of intentions. If you decide to pitch a fit on my talk page anyway, note that I endorse WP:DGAF.
If you're coming here to request I review your Good Article Nomination or your Featured Article Candidate I'm sorry, but I'm not doing these right now. Please don't ask because I'll feel bad about refusing.

Archives

2007: [Mar] [Apr] [May] [Jun] [Jul] [Jul 2] [Aug] [Aug 2] [Sep] [Sep 2] [Oct] [Oct 2] [Nov] [My RfA] [Nov 2] [Dec] [Dec 2]
2008: [Jan]

This is how shit gets done.

the_undertow ^talk 00:28, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OMGz

so liek i was blocked and then this relly kewl admin (me) leik unblocked me and then i had irc chatz with kittahz, and tehn, comma, it was ok, and tehn i had 30% of dleteing myslef, but didnt and then i went to bed, but before that i realizd that i adore u. happy holidays from teh drunks (some irc room in which is not named but has lulz). i realize none of this makes teh sense, but if it did, i would not be who i am, and im teh_artichoke. hic. teh_undertoes. the_undertow ^talk 12:15, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That may be the single best contribution I have made to not just this project, but to the world in general. Go artichoke! the_undertow ^talk 02:36, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Elvis

Thanks for your concern. This matter has been rehashed ad nauseam on the Talk page. There seems to be enough agreement to start fixing the mess. This was one of the most offensive paragraphs (I assume you're talking about the Elvis' Sex Life paragraph?) It seems to be agreed that it is now time to start cleaning up the mess. Why don't you join in and clean up some of the other stuff? We sure could use some help. We've been knuckling under to the person's obsessions for about a year now, and that's quite long enough, don't you think? Or do you have another plan that might work better? Hoserjoe (talk) 08:48, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's amusing. If you'd actually read the talk page, you'd see that I've created a WikiProject for Elvis and we're working on the article. Your changes have been discussed ad nauseum, in that you are correct, and I recall consensus was not in favor of said changes, and you stopped contributing some time after suspicions of sockpuppetry were raised. The article just came out of full protection because of a content dispute earlier this month. Don't force it to be locked again. Lara❤Love 16:44, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenix-wiki

Need your advice...

Please see User:The Transhumanist/Virtual classroom/Coaching/Phoenix-wiki#Ready or not?.

The Transhumanist 03:21, 27 December 2007 (UTC) Done [reply]

Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 52	26 December 2007	About the Signpost

Wales appoints six arbitrators	Board approves expansion, up to 11 trustees possible
WikiWorld comic: "Molasses"	News and notes: Stewards, Senate testimony, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	WikiProject Report: Plants
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 13:29, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good

morning. the_undertow ^talk 14:04, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:) I would reply on your talk page, but the colors mess with mine eyes. Haha. Good morning, Lara❤Love 14:50, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT EV- chip ^talk 14:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do I get a greeting from each of your personalities this morn? Lara❤Love 15:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello... here's a peer review

Sorry for this unsolicited request, but when I found out that you particular strength is polishing articles I just had to thank god and spam here, You see I have worked long and hard on the Sitakunda Upazila article (including creating a host of articles around it, mostly on plant and fish species), and taken it to Wikipedia:Peer review/Sitakunda Upazila (and, spammed around a bit). Many of the users I usually can depend on are on extended Wikibreaks (tears).

So far the review I have is fair, but I remember the first featured article I worked on, Shahbag, had much better response, including reviewers lending a hand where necessary (yes, particularly in the area of good prose). Would you, please, take a look at the review and the article? I beg of you, really, and I promise to meet every suggestion you'd make as far as I can.

You don't know me, yet, but I feel mighty confident making this request as I have gone through much research on you before daring to make the request (well, my last bout of spamming on a non-free image met a bit of irritation I didn't expect). Thanks :) Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 16:41, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dropped out of GA because of the hundreds of reviews I did on topics I don't know much about or have any particular interest in, which burned me out on article reviews. I'm listed as a peer reviewer, but only for specific topics of interest. I'm sorry. Lara❤Love 16:45, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Reviewing the unknown is real messy business. Well, just one look at the organization/structure would be more than adequate. I am a bit lost on structuring all the info in a smooth flow.

The account

Yes, thanks for telling me about that account. :) There seems to be someone going around at the moment creating usernames that spell out the usernames of administrators that have blocked them. Names that spell out "Ryulong" and "Misza13" exist. My own spoofer list is getting bigger now that I seem to be included in the group of administrators that has their usernames spelled out. :) Thanks again. Acalamari 18:17, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and yes, I will get around to an archiving of my talk page soon. :) Acalamari 18:17, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've not gotten spoofs yet. But I was included in a username with Phaedriel and PersianPoetGal. Good times. Lara❤Love 18:25, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Comment on Asian fetish

I nominated Asian fetish for RfC as the dispute between Tkguy and me continue to occur. (accusations about me having an agenda which continues to persist and please see his edit summaries at Asian fetish.) However, the RfC bot seems to be malfunctioning. (Other users have been reporting the same problems with RfC) Can you provide some early comments at the talk page of Asian fetish please? миражinred 22:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Knitta

[1][2] FYI. The diff I link to in my ES points to your message, which has since been removed from her talk page (by her). Cheers, — Dihydrogen Monoxide _(Review) 08:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GAN review of Knitta

Break ups are always so hard, but it's just not working out. We've drifted apart and I think it's time we went our separate ways. Don't blame yourself... we just have different goals. Anyway, I've boxed all your things up and left them by the door. I'm only taking Knitta with me. You can keep anything else you may have of mine. Sorry for the sadness this may bring, but I think it's best for us both this way. Lara❤Love 20:50, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay...I don't understand, but okay... miranda 03:40, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(/me taking a deep breath)...

First, I finished assessing Knitta. The article passed. Second, I really don't appreciate this edit, for several reasons: 1.) I took out my time to assess the article out of my free time. 2.) I used the icons to finally assess the article, since you asked me to assess it early. 3.) It was very rude. Also, I did not understand the "message" above on my talk page, until I looked at that edit, which was very hurtful to me. It's like, "there isn't a user reviewing this article, when in actuality there is one." However, this is Wikipedia, not real life. So, I guess I should take your "edit" as a grain of salt? But, in the words of Linkin Park, "in the end...it doesn't even matter." Thanks for wasting my time. miranda 08:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]