Jump to content

User talk:TravisTX

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TravisTX (talk | contribs) at 03:39, 8 January 2008 (→‎Could you please explain more fully?: reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

That was my mistake. I apologise for that. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 14:27, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

However there seems to is no purpose of this User:Willburgeo's account other than vandalism. See what this user is doing in William burge page. See also the talk page of the article William burge. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You nominated for deletion my article posted yesterday 12/20 -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PearsonWidrig_DanceTheater -- for copyright violation. This morning I obtained copyright permission and submitted it to permission-en@wikimedia.org. Can you help get the article posted? Many thanks--Jonwiener (talk) 03:17, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hello Jonwiener. I'm glad that you have taken the first steps to correcting the copyright problems with your article. I am not familiar with the process of obtaining approval of copyrighted materials, so I'd like to direct you to the help desk for more assistance. Thanks. —Travistalk 14:08, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chisolm Ski Club

Would it be a good idea to make a new encyclopedia entry on the Chisolm Ski Club? I don't want to make another mistake. Thanks, Inde. Please reply on my talk page. Independent147 (talk) 18:08, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Davis

The box is for records and awards, not for something he was the 7th player to do. It's fine in the article, but not enough for the infobox. Pats1 T/C 15:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

M-1 Carbine Article

The M1 carbine article is currently on lock down. An administrator has requested some discussion from memeber of the Firearms Wikiproject. Can you take a look?Sf46 (talk) 19:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I fixed my afd script to add that to the template it generates for me.--Crossmr (talk) 02:37, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain more fully?

Could you please explain more fully? You stated, on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Qaida facilitator, that you are concerned that the article doesn't comply with WP:NPOV.

I take compliance with WP:NPOV very seriously. I write on controversial topics. I bend over backwards to comply with this policy. There have been occasions when I can tell that another contributor has accused me of being a partisan on the other side of a controversy from the view I hold personally. A sign that, at least in those cases, I kept my POV out of those articles.

I ask everyone who hints, or states, that they are concerned my contributions have not complied with WP:NPOV to take the time to be specific. I'd appreciate it if you could draw my attention to a few specific passages, or even one specific passage, you are concerned lapses from NPOV.

Candidly, Geo Swan (talk) 03:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Neutral wording doesn’t hide the fact that the article focuses on one specific class of detainee. Due to that, and the lack of any introductory or explanatory text, I can see no purpose for the article than to attract attention to these people. —Travistalk 03:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]