User talk:Swift as an Eagle
| ||
Welcome!Hello, Swift as an Eagle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:53, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
A Question
Somehow, large parts have disappeared from the article underneath the section that I have edited, and I cannot find out how or why. Thank-you Tjbergsma (talk) 16:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Question over Infobox data
I have a question over the "Infobox Person" in the article Hendrik de Cock. Behind his birth date in brackets it says "(age 206)". I am assuming that is generated somehow because it cannot be edited out. But obviously if he's already died, than he can't be 206... so does anyone have any info on the Infobox? Thanks Tjbergsma (talk) 01:48, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
February 2008Re:ThanksNo problem. :) jj137 (talk) 04:44, 24 February 2008 (UTC) My editingWhile i salute you in your attempts to clean up wikipedia, and i understand why you were required to take down me edit; Clayton Bennett really is satan. If you look at the evil things he is doing to a great fan base by moving away a team thats been there for 41 years while he bought it with the full intent to move it, then he seems pretty satanic. While i apologize for speaking my opinion on wikipedia, what i said is probably true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.111.195.120 (talk) 03:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC) Re:Clayton BennettThank you. I'm not even a Sonics fan and i think its horrible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.111.195.120 (talk) 04:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC) Soverign Grace Ministries
Anyway, I have no personal opinions on the article, to be honest. I have to have a neutral point of view, and I think, definetly, the article has enough sources. However, conflict of interest needs to be addressed. And some of the sources..I think their reliability could be disputed. Steve Crossin (talk) 17:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC) Every source there is a well-known magazine (Charisma, CT) or a well-known author, or an official website. The criticism reference are not paper-published but they are on Wordpress and the hit count is unalterable by the manager of the website: 80,000 people have definitely visited it in 3 months. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Look2008 (talk • contribs) 18:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC) Do I sleep?Yes, I sleep occasionally. I'm using Huggle to revert vandalism. And, I'm getting sick of vandals. I've joined the Counter Vandalism Unit, and I right now have a zero-tolerance to vandals, whatsoever. But, I havent slept in...48hours, at least. Too busy reverting vandalism. Steve Crossin (talk) 07:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC) my edit to hatit was quite funny though :) Shamrock Texas verification of facts.<I have gone back and added links to various local media articles verifying the facts of the corruption that literally makes Shamroc a dangerous place for anyone not willing to participate in the drug industry. I was working on doing this when you deleted my work as it was in progress. More Shamrorock, Texas...No. It is I who should apologize. Please forgive me for I am new here. (Even though that is no excuse.) I do so very much appreciate your showing me how to cite references and so forth and I apologize for my previous indiscretions... Just as I have italicized this text and have made no fewer than three attempts at correcting it... Sorry! Miscellaneousur good man ur good im just here to have fun..and mess crap up so who cares...viva la raza ese... WSRIVAX3 SILENT —Preceding unsigned comment added by Claytonbigsby91 (talk • contribs) 23:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC) vandalisesorry but how did i vandalise any page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.217.186 (talk • contribs)
oh, but what defines valuable? i have seen lots of links that point to not much... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.217.186 (talk) 02:20, 2 March 2008 (UTC) An editI think the last sentence of this edit of yours at User talk:Mikkalai was unconstructive. --Coppertwig (talk) 14:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
The Shamrock page again...Tjbergsma, I want to thank you for fixing the page again. Beliebe it or not, someone had taken down a majority of what we have both done. I tried to put back a copy of what I had rchived but, unfortunately, it was a version from before your edits (which are very much more proper than are mine). Thanks! (I have now saved a copy as you have left it.) Hellojust stopped by to say hi. 75.144.70.141 (talk) 17:27, 6 March 2008 (UTC) |