Talk:WWE ECW
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WWE ECW article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 |
![]() | Television Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Professional wrestling Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() Archives |
---|
New Section
I believe that there should be a section in all WWE Brand articles that shows the brand's current roster. I'd like feedback on this proposal.
- There's already an article that lists all rosters, with the tv infobox linking to it. It's unnecessary.«»bd(talk stalk) 21:34, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
I just noticed that today. Sorry for the inconvenience. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Homie C (talk • contribs) 19:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Episodes?
90 Episodes not 91 as of 26 February, 2008? I've been counting them up on a few sites and can only get 90, anyone else find this? According to this site the last episode was #90. Starvinho (talk) 16:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- I think you are right, I just checked a calender and the only way it could be 91 is if they had 2 episodes during 1 week. I think someone may have upped the episode count without changing the air date, and then someone else wanted to update it and upped the episode count while updating the date too. TJ Spyke 01:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- I didn't want to go change it without being sure, I counted episodes on 3 or 4 different sites though and came up with 90 each time, but thought I'd just ask someone else on here first just incase I was going mad! Starvinho (talk) 08:45, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
15 Minutes of Fame
It should be changed to being used in 2008, because it was used when the tag titles were being defended on ECW?