User talk:C.Fred

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

This user is busy in real life until Tax Day and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Note: Due to work obligations, my responses to comments made here may be delayed from Feb. 1 until April 15.

Please add new threads to the bottom of the page. I will reply to your talk page unless you request otherwise. I may reply to your talk page and copy my response here to preserve a thread or note that the issue has been dealt with.

Note that all threads older than 7 days will be archived. Please sign and date your comment (by adding ~~~~ at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.

Uncivil comments may be deleted summarily.

Keep improving

Regarding with the topic:1Stop . While before me classmate is not familiar with the function of wiki and they dont put much reference. However, we are working on this and please share you tips with us to improve the creditability. Why we want to share is just because this is a new topic of our univeristy course and just taught by our professor. We want to share our view and collection of studies while gather other knowledge as well as learn from each others. Please give your helpful hand. We are not promoting anything and just want to share and build knowledge.

Thanks

Thanks a lot. Your senseless and baseless criticism of my wikipedia entry concerning IMPACT- Charlottesville has proven that wikipedia is not, in fact, a public encyclopedia that encourages everyone to contribute sensible, informative and interesting articles. I believe as an administrator you have a duty to engender an ethos of contribution, not lambast it with non-existent local clauses. You spend way too much time on your computer and not enough in the real world and in short, are unworthy of such a position. I will immediately lodge a complaint with whatever authorities hold you responsible, and if that does not work, your fellow peers. Community service (talk) 17:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I merely try to establish the fact that you sir, are an idiot, sir and unworthy of whatever title this sycophantic community has bestowed on you. Community service (talk) 18:06, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Woit/Stinkdiagram

The user's got a visible conflict of interest, seeing as he has edited no other page whatsoever. The first few diffs are worrying and have escalated to "revert-on-sight". Will ^(talk) 18:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jose Mourinho

I'm sorry,you are right.It was a Sky News bulletin at 17:02 that said he was dead. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kelleherjoe (talk • contribs) 18:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the move

It appears he's gotten a bit frustrated with the process. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 18:50, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic IP

Hello, C. Fred. This IP address, 70.108.92.126, has become a problem. He or she constantly adds unsourced information to articles such as birth names of real-life people, and when reverted (just check out this IP's contributions and talk page history), reinstates the unsourced information. Not only that...but refuses to listen in regards to Wikipedia's formatting style when it comes to articles, and instead insists on formatting articles the way he or she wants, all because he or she saw it formatted that way (wrongly, I might add) in many other articles on Wikipedia. I have told this IP countless times, such as when editing the Elisabeth Hasselbeck article, the correct way to format, but, nope, he or she refuses. Reverts other editors' edits when their edits seem to agree about removing poor sources, and reverts edits that try to keep neutral wording, instead keeping poor wording.

Any help that you can give on this matter would be much appreciated. Flyer22 (talk) 22:29, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Community service (talk · contribs)

I was about to block this guy for 48 hours, but I see you've done that, and for the same reason. Since you're involved, I think it would be better if I, as an uninvolved admin, reversed your block and imposed my own. This will relieve you of accusations of bias. Regards. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 02:24, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked and reblocked. The phrase "spoilt child" springs to mind, if you want to take a peek at his Talk page. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 02:35, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

5o4plan images.

Thanks for helping with the copyright problems for my images... They were used in an article, but it got deleted. I'm not sure why, I'm hoping it'll be allowed to be re-added because I really don't think there was anything wrong with it... As for the image from Myspace, it's also posted on Purevolume and on various other sites. Does that mean it's still under copyright? If so, if whoever runs their Myspace say it's okay to use, is that enough? And how could I prove that? Until I know more, I can use a photo taken by a fan.. although at this point the article doesn't even exist so I guess that's kind of pointless. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LickLickSalute (talk • contribs) 18:18, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advice on what to do

C. Fred, looking for some advice and help on how to handle a situation. I have been editing a page (subject is Steven Libutti) regarding a physician and scientist. A user GPHemsley keeps deleting my work and adding flags for notability. A simple Google or Pubmed search of the subject of the page shows that questions of notability are absurd. I have tried being nice with GPHemsley but his most recent edit accuses me of being the subject and he is now taking this to an inappropriate level that I don't think is in the spirit of Wikipedia. Rather than get into a back and forth with him, I was wondering if you could advise me on what I can do to try to keep him from defacing the page? Any advice would be appreciated.

Respectfully,

Mike MFC8290 (talk) 20:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mike, I would like to know how you "have tried to be nice" when you had only made one edit to the page prior to berating me in all sorts of places, including via e-mail. You type in all capital letters on my talk page, threaten to report me to the "Wikipedia editorial staff" and then do so without waiting for my response, and call my tagging an article for cleanup and a notability check "hacking" and "defacing" an article. I don't see how you can call me a child. To C.Fred: I acknowledge your edit war message, as it is valid. —Gordon P. Hemsley→✉ 21:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C. Fred,

Thank you for your response. I appreciate your effort and for my part, I agree not to respond in kind to GPHemsley. I thought I was handling the situation properly when I addressed it in my edits. Hemsley has repeatedly tagged the article for notability, when a simple google or PubMed search on the subject would have clearly established notability. In looking up who Hemsley is, I noticed that he was from the same home town as the subject and I concluded that he may have something personal against the subject. This belief was reinforced when Hemsley accused me of being the subject. I am willing to give Hemsley the benefit of the doubt. I pledge not to continue this back and forth with him if he leaves the page alone. Certainly there must be others who can "police" this page for notability that do not have an agenda or bias.

Thank you for your help with this.

Respectfully,

Mike MFC8290 (talk) 21:50, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete key worn out yet? :)

he just won't give up! TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 04:53, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		keeping Wiki spam free TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 04:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Wikimania08

Thanks for the follow-up on that. I wasn't sure if that was quite a threat or not. Toddst1 (talk) 23:19, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User talk:Kneesthey

Nevermind the "warning", was just trying to get an admin to delete the page. Vivio Testarossa^{Talk Who} 05:52, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another WP:3RR

On the Quadruple-double page, User:Cyberdyne systems has come off of his WP:3RR block and returned to make five reversions today. I thought I'd come to you first, since you have experience with him (and his obvious sockpuppetry of TyrusThomas4lyf). Thanks! Redrocket (talk) 19:44, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Luke Ward-Wilkinson

An editor has nominated Luke Ward-Wilkinson, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Ward-Wilkinson and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:59, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Kaziz

The article on Kaziz has been incorrectly deleted as it is a general background information for Kazid Ali and Abdulaziz Belhaj who will be campaiging for the Manchester University Student Union Executives. This pdf link is for Kazids application to become a society secretary www.umsu.man.ac.uk/pdf/ALI_socsec.pdf and this is for Abdulaziz www.umsu.man.ac.uk/pdf/BELHAJ_services.pdf —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chapelle dave (talk • contribs) 00:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Dennis D'Antin

Dennis D'Antin is a currently working actor in hollywood. look him up on IMDB, or just type his name on a search page. He is my client, he is becoming widely known in hollywood circles and deserves his page just as much as you do. If you disagree then you should delete your own page Cfred. please respond. -JE- —Preceding unsigned comment added by James Eddy Publicity (talk • contribs) 04:27, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Dennis D'Antin

My apologies, but the page I created was no different then that of the Nick Cannon page. An actor page with a biography. I believe my client deserves one. I believe you have blocked me from re-creating the page, and I have given you sufficient sources. May I try again? —Preceding unsigned comment added by James Eddy Publicity (talk • contribs) 04:40, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ETA: he's been blocked. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 12:01, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

David Hayter: Sorry

I did not mean to undo the wiki page. I did not read your message until after. Naers (talk) 04:08, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Naers[reply]

Thank you Naers (talk) 04:16, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lovette link removal

The person being biographied would like the link removed as She has received numerous inquiries about the exact location of her home The city being published is putting her in danger, why can the link not be removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amarant edea (talk • contribs) 01:51, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]