Jump to content

User talk:Rappingwonders

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rappingwonders (talk | contribs) at 23:10, 24 March 2008 (→‎Seperate page moves: 2 more.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives

January 2008 archive

Unblock requests

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rappingwonders (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not 98E for the last time. And I didn't type that outburst from before, that was my brother, he went on my account while I was out doing something and I'm still pissed at him. Rappingwonders (talk) 01:32, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have yet to provide convincing evidence to support the assertion that you are not 98E. A Checkuser has confirmed that your IP address could be a match to the banned user, and the evidence you have provided is very evasive (Yes, I can view the deleted versions of this page). What your account does is your responsibility - even if compromised, you are accountable for what edits this accounts makes as the person who created it. Your request for unblock is denied until you can provide convincing evidence that you are not a duplicate account. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 01:52, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rappingwonders (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This request is not requesting that I be completely unblocked, just that my e-mail be re-enabled. Here's the full story on what happened:

  1. After being blocked and having my request declined, I decided to go ride my bike outdoors to try to get my mind off of Wikipedia (yes, I ride a bike even though I'm an adult).
  2. A few hours later, my brother called me, and the conversation was like this: "Me: "Hello?". "My brother: Yeah, hey Marc, you gotta come check this funny shit out!". "Me: What "funny shit"?". "My brother: You'll see. But not until you get home! So c'mon, slowpoke! Get home quickly!". "Me: Okay, I'm coming!"".
  3. Then, he showed me the "funny shit" in the page history, and I almost had a heart attack.
  4. Then, he also told me he sent an death threat e-mail to Spellcast. #I started to hit him.
  5. Then, until last night, when the page got deleted, I was waiting for it to be deleted so I could request unblocking again.
So now you see. This is the full story, and I request that my e-mail be re-enabled so I can work this out with Spellcast. Rappingwonders (talk) 15:02, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The request to re-enable your e-mail access is declined due to the prior abuse of e-mail by this account. However, I will ask Spellcast to watch this page for your communications. — Sandstein (talk) 15:34, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I just said that it was my brother who sent that e-mail. He took my account while I was out of my house. Rappingwonders (talk) 15:35, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Besides what I just said, you should take a look through my contributions. Do you see ANY vandalism? Maybe just a little bit that I didn't know was vandalism, but not a lot. Also, if I DO get unblocked, there are TONS of album/single covers that NEED to be reduced. I could make a lot more useful edits here (in addition to the ones I already have), if you unblock me, because I hadn't even heard of 98E until I was blocked. Rappingwonders (talk) 16:08, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Now, Spellcast is claiming that my excuse is a joke. No, it is true. My brother stole my account and did that outburst. If an admin sees this, please tell Spellcast to add my talk page to his watchlist, because I have a lot of things to say about this. Rappingwonders (talk) 16:16, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rappingwonders (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All I'm simply requesting is that my e-mail be re-enabled. I'm not requesting that I be completely unblocked. Just that my e-mail be re-enabled. The reason is above, so please restore my e-mail. Rappingwonders (talk) 21:15, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The abuse from this account appears to be in using email, so I see no reason to allow that abuse via email to continue. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 23:04, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You actually didn't bother to check my explanation above? Rappingwonders (talk) 23:07, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did. You admit that this account has been used to send death threats via email. Since this account is insecure, we cannot trust it anymore. I see no reason to unblock anything, since security has been breached. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 23:11, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And I also that it was not me who sent those threats. Rappingwonders (talk) 23:12, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yet it WAS this account. Since this account has been used by a person to send such threats via email, this account will remain blocked...--Jayron32.talk.contribs 23:14, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But that's the only time my brother's used it. He stole it after my stupid computer glitched up and didn't log me out when it was supposed to. Rappingwonders (talk) 23:16, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All right

All right, I've had enough of this. I will give you some REALLY good reasons why I should be unblocked:

The following images need to be fair use reduced:
  1. Image:AliciaKeys-AsIAm.jpg
  2. Image:FloRadio.JPG
  3. Image:FloElevator.jpg
  4. Image:Keyshiacole.jpg
  5. Image:PartyPeopleSingle.jpg
  6. Image:WhotheFuckIsThat?.jpg
  7. Image:Lilmamasgl.jpg
  8. Image:Bartender (T-Pain song).jpg
  9. Image:OuttaMySystem.jpg
  10. Image:Justlikeyou.jpg
  11. Image:Snoop Dogg - Vato.jpg
  12. Image:Mike Jones - My64.jpg
  13. Image:50 Cent Bulletproof 2.jpg
  14. Image:Big Things Poppin' (Do It).JPG
  15. Image:Breaktheicecover.jpg
  16. Image:GLASSES MALONE feat AKON - Certified.jpg
  17. Image:15 - Hot.JPG
The following images need to be fair use increased:
  1. Image:I won't tell fat joe.JPG
  2. Image:Running.jpg
  3. Image:GCH-School.jpg
  4. Image:Letitgo2.jpg
  5. Image:Just dont give a.jpg
The following pages need to be moved (I'll give the reasons for them as well):
  1. Big Boi and Dre Present…OutKast -> OutKast (album)
    Reason: Titles that say "present" or "presents" in them actually don't have that part in them.
  2. Timbaland Presents Shock Value -> Shock Value (album)
    Reason: Titles that say "present" or "presents" in them actually don't have that part in them.
  3. All Eyez on Me -> All Eyez on Me (2Pac album)
    Reason: There is also a Monica album with this title.
  4. Hate It or Love It -> Hate It or Love It (song)
    Reason: There is also an album with this title.
  5. 5 Star Stunna -> 5 * Stunna
    Reason for this one: This is the title shown on the cover.
Okay, so yeah. Look at all of this pages that require edits. If you unblock me, I will do all the edits I said need to be done. Rappingwonders (talk) 01:19, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No response? Rappingwonders (talk) 14:36, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So someone decides to remove the category. But doesn't respond at the same time. Rappingwonders (talk) 14:47, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, improper use of the helpme function, and you have a discussion with Jayron32, you can ask him. Mion (talk) 14:49, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Except I can't. It would help the Wiki projects a lot if it was possible to edit other users' talk pages as well when blocked. Also, I added more images that need reducing. Rappingwonders (talk) 14:53, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seperate page moves

This is a list of the other pages that also need to be moved, but because of caps and no other reason.

  1. Fly Like Me -> Fly like Me
  2. Thuggin' Under the Influence -> Thuggin under the Influence (T.U.I.)
  3. Feels Like Tonight -> Feels like Tonight
  4. Candy (Drippin' Like Water) -> Candy (Drippin' like Water)
  5. Don't Feed The Animals -> Don't Feed the Animals
  6. Like Father, Like Son -> Like Father, like Son
  7. Colby O'Donis -> Colby O’donis
I'll think of more later for sure. Rappingwonders (talk) 22:50, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About the CheckUser

Okay, now I will give you another reason to unblock me. Okay, so my page is tagged with the {{sock}} tag. Now, it says that the person I'm a sock of is 98E. Now, I click on the category "Wikipedia sockpuppets of 98E", and then I decided to check the "Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of 98E" category. I see 2 IP's that start with the range "71.". Okay, so this is 98E's IP (from what I can see):

"71.233.232.243".

Now, here's mine:

"71.233.232.196".

Very similar range, but not the same. I don't know why I have the same range as 98E but if anyone might have an idea why, please tell me. But now you see that my IP is at least a LITTLE different. Rappingwonders (talk) 14:58, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you made 3 review request, 3 times denied by 3 different people, what do you expect for the future ? Mion (talk) 15:04, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Look above. There are TONS of edits I said had to be made. I said that I would save an admin's time of doing them if I get unblocked. Plus there are probably A LOT that I can't think of right now. Rappingwonders (talk) 15:06, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, there are even millions of edits to be made on the wikipedia, but not from this account. This one is blocked. Mion (talk) 15:09, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The only problem is that it's blocked for a fraud reason. Rappingwonders (talk) 15:09, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If I'm not able to do them, why don't you do them? If you want to. They would be good edits although they would take some time. If you let me do them, they'll only take around 10 minutes. Rappingwonders (talk) 15:24, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No response? Why is it that I only get a response when I add the category? Rappingwonders (talk) 22:02, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you continue to remove it without responding at the same time? That's kinda the point. Rappingwonders (talk) 22:16, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All that we could talk has past, the discussion is closed. Mion (talk) 22:19, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No it's not. I have the list of edits above and if you unblock me, I will save someone elses' time of doing it. Rappingwonders (talk) 22:21, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it is, Unblocking is not available for this account, so you have to wait until it expires. Mion (talk) 22:24, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
When are the edits above gonna be done? Rappingwonders (talk) 22:28, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Time will tell. and if you just want to chat, join irc. Mion (talk) 22:31, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not chatting here, I'm requesting something. Why don't YOU do the edits? Rappingwonders (talk) 22:34, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Because if I would do all the things other people want me to do I don't get anywhere but wasting time. Thats whyMion (talk) 22:36, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Then who's gonna do them if I can't? Rappingwonders (talk) 22:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note that 98E is banned. Any user who performs edits on behalf of a banned user faces sanctions. Please do not try to get other users into trouble by trying to get them to do your edits for you. Spartaz Humbug! 22:39, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There's just 1 problem with that logic: I am not 98E. How many times have I said it now? Rappingwonders (talk) 22:42, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously, why do you still believe that I'm 98E? It's been proven that I'm not. Rappingwonders (talk) 22:52, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Let me phrase: Yet it WAS this account. Since this account has been used by a person to send such threats via email, this account will remain blocked, so playing on other elements is not changing anything.Mion (talk) 22:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Except the person who sent them (my brother) is never gonna use this account again. I demand an unblock or else I will have to do something too brutal to say. Rappingwonders (talk) 22:56, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not impressed.Mion (talk) 22:58, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So you're gonna leave me blocked for NO reason? I don't wanna have to use my other way, but I will be forced to if you don't lift this fraud block. Rappingwonders (talk) 22:59, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's up to you to use your dark side, but you wont make friends with it. Mion (talk) 23:05, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It involves something VERY unspeakable that could change Wikipedia FOREVER. Rappingwonders (talk) 23:31, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you have to be more specific. how else can I believe you? Mion (talk) 23:36, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Because it involves WP:NLT. Rappingwonders (talk) 23:36, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see, in that case contact the WMF. Mion (talk) 23:39, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Then my e-mail needs to be re-enabled. Rappingwonders (talk) 23:40, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And remember, we are standing on different (jurisdictional) grounds. Mion (talk) 23:41, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't get it. Rappingwonders (talk) 23:42, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
NP. Mion (talk) 00:09, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If that means "no problem", then I don't understand what there would be a problem with. Rappingwonders (talk) 21:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And if the above edits aren't done, then the admin who sees them but refuses to do them is obviously trying to make Wikipedia a bad place. Rappingwonders (talk) 21:11, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Soapboxing?

{{helpme}} Apparently Spellcast has stating that I've been "soapboxing". I tried looking up the definition for that but I don't get it. What does "soapboxing" mean? Rappingwonders (talk) 21:07, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That means using Wikipedia to voice your views, which is prohibited by WP:NOT. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 21:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
To voice my views? I don't quite get what that means either. Rappingwonders (talk) 21:21, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just look at WP:SOAP Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 21:22, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So you mean I'm not allowed to voice my opinion about my block? I thought that was what the {{unblock}} template was for. Rappingwonders (talk) 21:23, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If Spellcast was accusing you of this, that is not correct use of policy. Looking at your talk page above, I will not give any opinions of past actions. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 21:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Use of what policy? Rappingwonders (talk) 22:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rappingwonders&oldid=200662309"