Talk:Dragon Ball Z: Burst Limit
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dragon Ball Z: Burst Limit article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2 |
![]() | Anime and manga: Dragon Ball Stub‑class | ||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 19 December 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Talk Page.
I decided to start up the talk page, so we can TALK about what's gonna happen with the article. I've added the First Source as a Scan, and cleaned up a tiny bit. ^_^. --Undead Pancake (talk) 02:08, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
This page could use a bit more information from the Jeux France article.-SSJ Gokan (talk) 03:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- Then Bring it over? Don't forget to cite it! --Undead Pancake (talk) 03:17, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Article
You guys seriously messed up the article. I'm gonna make some changes to the style.UltimaFighter 13:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
What happened to references?
Seriously. Somebody fix the references. Somebody has gone and done something to it. And remove the links to YouTube. They really shouldn't be linked to if Atari are trying to remove them.--Kamiccolo33 (talk) 22:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Bardock?
Since when is Bardock confirmed? Give a link or something or he'll be out of there. I'm sick of people editing in characters that have NOT been confirmed.--Kamiccolo33 (talk) 00:59, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
charecters
teen gohan super saiyan, super saiyan 2, nappa, android 16, yamcha, raditz, piccolo, perfect cell and siybermen are all confirmed in these scans, broly, gogeta
http://jeux-france.com/Webmasters/Images/6249620071219_182533_0_big.jpg
http://jeux-france.com/Webmasters/Images/6249620071219_182540_1_big.jpg
http://jeux-france.com/Webmasters/Images/6249620071219_182545_2_big.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.32.236 (talk) 10:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Learn to spell. Lex T/C Guest Book 15:27, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Confirmed Characters table
I've placed all the confirmed characters in a Wikitable. This way it's more well-organized - at least I think it is. I was in doubt whether it should be put in a Wikitable, or in a navbox which you can collapse. For now I chose to do it this way, but if anyone feels it should be done in a different way, feel free to change it. Allthough just a list of characters (like it was before) is in my opinion not so nice looking. -Jort227 (talk) 22:37, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Um...
Well it says this game will be the first DBZ game to have in-game cut scenes but that was in Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi 3, and it also says that it is the first to have online play, but Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi 3 already had that. Maybe someone should change that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.252.240.230 (talk) 03:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
US Release as Super Budokai?
Where has it been announced that Atari will be releasing the game as Super Budokai? Sarujo (talk) 13:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Pre-emptive protection
I don't mean literal protection as in locking the page, I mean some common-sense protection from idiots.
I suggest we turn the Character List into a table and add several invisible comments (The ones in the code, not visible on the article proper) reminding users they need to have a verifiable source for characters.
The character list and release date are going to be the hot topics for flame wars and vandalism, this is exactly what happened on the last three dragonball z game articles.
Obviously a character can only be added to the list if there is a verifiable source. Can we have a consensus/guideline/rule/restriction that says the only verifiable source is the official website for the game?
Does anyone remember the string of youtube links used as references and the inevitable flame wars about it being a different game or a fake or a mod or you needing to pause the high-res version of the video at exactly 1:24 to see a translucent false-colour image of SSJ3 Young Goku...
It is not up to us to decide on every single youtube video whether or not it comes from a reliable source. Aside from making a mess it's not exactly official. If we restricted the characters allowed to be added to be only the ones coming from the official site then things would be a lot lot smoother.
Sorry if I've angered anyone by suggesting a legislative change. If you disagree with me just say "I disagree" don't make a big argument about this and don't make personal attacks please. 193.128.87.36 (talk) 11:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, I would edit the character list into a table and add comments myself but I always mess up the pagination when I try to use Wiki's special formatting options. 193.128.87.36 (talk) 11:27, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
I agree, there are too many people posting rubbish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.252.228.104 (talk) 16:59, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
What rubbish is this?
Other fans hope it will at least reaches Buu saga, but internet game detective Charles Harles suspects this game has the fusion saga, which is one of the last Movie Saga that take place right after the Majin Buu Saga. "Hopefully fans will be happy with it going to fusion saga, then the next Burst Limit would have GT to cover." Charles says in an interview.
What... what the HELL? I don't know where to begin on this subject. Fusion Saga a "Movie Saga"? Internet game detective? This is all trash. The S (talk) 22:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
New info
I added some new information about the game's use of in-fight cutscenes and support characters, which has been revealed by the first videos of gameplay. See [1] and especially [2] as a source. These were recorded last week at the Taipei Game Show 2008. Admeister200x (talk) - 6th February 2008
Expected to reach out only to - ?
First it says "Kid Buu" saga. Now it says Cell saga. Source?--99.228.21.74 (talk) 00:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
We've had no evidence/announcement on that subject, so it doesn't belong in the article. Deleted. Admeister200x 13 February 2008 —Preceding comment was added at 13:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Release date
To whoever added the line about a release date, you listed no source, and there has been no official confirmation, so it doesn't belong in this article. Admeister200x 14 February 2008
Stop adding it! It's not official, it has no place in this article. I'll just keep deleting it. Admeister200x 18 February 2008 —Preceding comment was added at 00:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
EU Release
this game has been confirmed for europe here is a link http://www.namcobandaigames.eu/en/press/16/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.46.223 (talk) 11:16, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Added to the article, thanks. Admeister200x 21 February 2008 —Preceding comment was added at 13:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
http://www.ataricommunity.com/forums/showthread.php?t=634505
These guys caused the vandalism —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.71.37.207 (talk) 19:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Confirmed Date
http://www.gamespot.com/video/0/6186632/videoplayerpop?rgroup=gdc08_live The PS3 and XBOX 360 versions will be released in july 2008. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.158.187.51 (talk) 22:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for that, that video has a lot of useful info. I've added things from it, but I'm having trouble with putting in a reference to it in the article. Whenever I put in a reference, it eats the Gameplay section. Admeister200x - 27 February 2008 —Preceding comment was added at 02:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Playable Characters
The link confirming 35 playable characters is not a V-Jump scan. I assume it's safe to say it's been vandalized: http://img232.imagevenue.com/view.php?image=26190_a27_122_385lo.JPG --74.12.31.242 (talk) 15:58, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
That happens sometimes for some reason. Try a second time, but it DOES go to a V-Jump scan because I have used that link.--Kamiccolo33 (talk) 00:59, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
The new meristation vedio
This vedio had been tbanslated by verious sites like Atari forums and game faqs massage boards.. every thing I posted in the atricle is 100% true so please don't delete it unliss you are shore this is wrong. also the japanese release data has been confirmed in the psn trailer so it is 100% official. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The-skulls-lover (talk • contribs) 14:40, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Broly and Bardock?
Since when Bardock and Broly comfrimed? SuperSaiyanCrash 8:00 24th March 2008 (UTC).
Errr...
the first video game from the Dragon Ball franchise for next generation consoles? isn't wii a next generation console? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.24.54.185 (talk) 13:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Yes, it is. We will change it.