Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jailbait (2nd nomination)

Delete simple dicdef. Possibly redirect to ~~Lolita (term)~~ Jailbait (disambiguation) after deletion. Previous keep arguments three years ago were based on the idea that the article could be expanded, but it has not been and doesn't seem to be expandable. See old VFD here [1].Ave Caesar (talk) 13:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this is Wictionary stuff. Springnuts (talk) 13:33, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ...and it's already in Wiktionary. JohnCD (talk) 17:09, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment why not simply redirect to Jailbait (disambiguation)? There are a number of movies with this title in the disambiguation page. --Xyzzyplugh (talk) 19:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/merge There is lots to say about this as the sources indicate. Much of it may be covered by articles such as statutory rape but the sources seem to cover other aspects of juvenile delinquency. Anyway, it is an obvious search term and so should be kept as a redirect at least. Colonel Warden (talk) 21:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the disambiguation page. (And add Lolita (term) to the disambig page). Bfigura ^(talk) 23:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect per Bfigura. JuJube (talk) 01:35, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Important concept, isn't covered exactly by either Lolita or Ephebophilia. Maybe expand article to discuss age of consents.Ask D.N.A.- Peter Napkin (talk) 04:11, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]