Talk:The Move
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Biography: Musicians B‑class | |||||||||
|
Chronology
Phew! I think i've cracked it this time.The timeline of this goup was all over the place but now I think it makes sense. The Equaliser 00:39 11 January
- Could you please put members who weren't in the band when they split up into the Former Members section of the Infobox, and make a lineup section at the bottom of the article? (member, years, instrument). Readers shouldn't have to plough through the text to get this data :) --kingboyk 17:57, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Compilations
I own an album titled THE MOVE (Shines On), Harvest SHSM 2029, containing the complete Message From The Country album plus four bonus tracks (Do Ya, Chinatown on the end of side one, and Tonight, California Man on side two, respectively). Does anyone know when it was released?--Menrathu 11:17, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Flowers in the rain radio 1
According to this http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/6960296.stm the story that the move's track was the first to be played on radio one is an urban legend. Unusual Cheese 10:48, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:ELECTRIC LIGHT ORCHESTRA.jpg
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:ELECTRIC LIGHT ORCHESTRA.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 07:26, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:ELECTRIC LIGHT ORCHESTRA.jpg
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:ELECTRIC LIGHT ORCHESTRA.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 14:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
THIS "ARTICLE" IS HORRIFIC
Dreadful English -- rambling, unstructured, unsourced garbage. Delete it, and start again with much better quality, and at least an attempt at something encyclopedic.