Talk:Alesana

Emo

Just to let everyone know I am related to one of the two founding members of alesana. They came up with the term sweetcore to describe their music. In fact when they released their first album on tragic hero records they had a few hundred alesana shirts made with xoxo sweetcore on the front and a heart with our area code 919[1] on the back. They also have described themselves as screamo emo and post hardcore as well especially since myspace doesn't allow you to type in SweetCore. ~meckface

I believe in AMP magazine quite a few months ago they called themselves "sweetcore" and does it really matter if they are emo or not?

can some one plz post a pic w/ a left to right heading w/ thier names i cant figur out whos who —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.82.57.145 (talk) 01:30, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

They are emo.In their myspace is written that.And another thing - find place where is said they're Not emo and I won't change it again. In Allmusic.com is also stated "screamo/post-hardcore" If you don't think that way-write in this talk page and do not just edit the article without any sources! Xr 1 08:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

So what if their Myspace states that genre? Perhaps they should read the screamo article, aswell. Myspace isn't a relevant source. Enter Shikari lists their genre on their myspace as J-pop. Does that make them a J-pop band? No. In your talk page you even said yourself, about another genre dispute, that "...according to me they are pop punk." Wikipedia is not a place for personal opinion. Ambrosia- 02:34, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

"Wikipedia is not a place for personal opinion"...well then write the wrong labels.I say what I think and I think in that way because I've listened to the music and know about the genre.And it's not just my personal opinion: [2], [3], [4], [5] "They should read the screamo article" an article in wikipedia cannot make them not a screamo,emo,post-hardcore group. Although I've read the article and there it's said only "Characteristic of the genre are screaming vocals, harmonized guitars, and fast-paced riffs." Well they have that!Xr 1 18:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Who are you to say that? Get a real source. You aren't to write "what you think". This is an encyclopedia, not a blog. Take a long at what Wikipedia is, specifically

WIKIPEDIA IS NOT FOR UNSOURCED MATERIAL

WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A PLACE TO PUBLISH YOUR OPINIONS

WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A PLACE TO PUBLISH YOUR NEW IDEAS

You say that it's what you think, but then you go and say it's not just your opinion? You are just citing uncredible sources. MP3.com and Urban Dictionary are user submitted work (that means that those also have no sources) and Myspace and Purevolume aren't credible sources, regardless of whether or not you think they are.Ambrosia- 17:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Ok.I'll not write my opinion (no matter that when I think something it is checked and not invented by me) But isn't this a reliable source - [6] ? Xr 1 18:22, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

I am unsure, but really, if you read the post-hardcore article, you will also see that post-hardcore incorporates screaming into the music. Screamo is a totally different genre, as the majority of Alesana's music is not screaming, making the (uninformed) adding of "screamo" as a genre just plain redundant. IMO, screamo is a very overused word with an underused meaning. Ambrosia- 18:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

You have a mistake-The Majority of Alesana's music IS with screaming.There are screams in almost every song.Just listen. And I'm not gonna change the genre because Post-Hardcore is a general term which include Emo,Screamo,Metalcore etc. Xr 1 19:25, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Just because their are screams "in almost every song" does not make them a screamo band. Do go through list of screamo groups and tell me if any other bands you would consider "screamo" are listed in there. The band incorporates as much melodic singing (if not more) as screaming. Just because a band has screaming vocals does not mean they are a screamo band. Differentiate between hardcore/post-hardcore and screamo. Ambrosia- 19:35, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

You've understanded me wrong.Yes-screams don't make a band screamo.I'm just saying that they scream in almost every song because you said 'as the majority of Alesana's music is not screaming' AND The list of screamo bands include many bands that are not screamo.When you click and open some of the articles you can find that genres are metalcore,emo,hardcore without screamo Xr 1 19:41, 19 May 2007 (UTC) Here are sources (which can be definite as reliable) that describe Alesana as Emo/Screamo: [7] [8] [9] Xr 1 20:35, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

need4sound and iSound don't even have a Wikipedia page. Many post-hardcore and metalcore bands are mistakingly added. And once again proving that you have no clue what you are talking about, screamo is an offshoot of emo and hardcore. Podshow itself is not devoted to music, so I do not see how it could be a reliable source in a genre dispute.

"PodShow.com, the main brand of Podshow, Inc., is a social networking website, podcast directory, podcast delivery network, and music store" Ambrosia- 20:57, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

And what if they don't have a wikipedia page??Wikipedia can't have pages for everything! "And once again proving that you have no clue what you are talking about, screamo is an offshoot of emo and hardcore." Yes I know that.Where I've said it's not an offshoot of emo and hardcore?? But in the page about Post-harcore is said that Emo and Screamo are its derivative forms. "Many post-hardcore and metalcore bands are mistakingly added." Oh, I'm so glad you finally agreed with me about something.I've said I wouldn't change the genre section, but Alesana is Emocore/Post-Hardcore and can be also described as being Screamo. Xr 1 21:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

If they were reliable sources, they would have their own Wikipedia page, no. As for the rest, I really have no clue what you are saying. Ambrosia- 03:24, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm saying that Post-Hardcore is rather a cross genre reference, a stage (like Post Punk) including all the genres that come from Hardcore Punk than a single genre.That's why Emo,Screamo,Math rock,Metalcore are listed as it's derivative forms in it's article.If you try to argue with me about that Post-Hardcore is a single genre I'd say the article needs a big clean up-a message is shown when you open it so you can't trust it very much. Post-Hardcore is fine for Alesana's genre but if someone include Emo/Screamo would be better.I listen to some screamo and I can tell they have screamo in their sound-but this is a personal opinion.Because of that I find sources-you can say they're not relialbe but allmusic is and there is written "Post-Hardcore, Screamo". And you're saying that if something doesn't have page in wikipedia it's stupid.Well I'm from Bulgaria-many Bulgarian musicians don't have page here-So according to you they are stupid??? Xr 1 07:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Where have I said that Bulgarian musicians are stupid? Hell, where have I said anything is stupid? I am saying that if a source that you would call "reliable", and it were as widely known (therefore credible), it would have it's own Wikipedia page. Perhaps learn to grasp the concept of the English language? Once again, screamo is a term thrown around that many people don't know the meaning of. Just because you read it on the band's Myspace or Purevolume, doesn't make it so. And don't give me any "I found other sources" BS, because you had only searched up for their genre (on other sources) after I told you that Myspace wouldn't have been a credible source. Ambrosia- 13:49, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

• Ok, but if they're not widely known that doesn't make them unreliable!And because something doesn't have page here that doesn't mean it's insignificant and stupid.I gave example with the musicians because they also don't have page here.You don't say they are stupid but your post can be interpreted as you meant that only significant things in the world have pages in wikipedia.But let's go back to the genre discussion.
• I guess you will find source that IS reliable and states they're NOT Emo/Screamo!!If you do this I'll admit that they're not screamo/emo.Xr 1 14:09, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

There are no sites that state what genre a band isn't. Ok, you still don't get what I mean. If something IS AS CREDIBLE AS YOU SAY IT IS, IT WOULD BE QUITE POPULAR AND WOULD MOST LIKELY HAVE IT'S OWN WIKIPEDIA PAGE. Yes, if they aren't widely known, they probably wouldn't be reliable. However, the two unreliable sources you gave me were NOT RELIABLE.

WP:RS:

Yeah I know there are no sites that state what genre a band isn't. I meant- find me some source where is not written emo/screamo as their genre and it's just post-hardcore.And then I'll leave only post-hardcore as a genre.And some opinios of users can't make a band not screamo-as you said-they are just personal opinions.And wikipedia works with sources which state- Emocore/Screamo.Reliable or not-there are no other sources!Xr 1

• Alesana isn't a hardcore punk band.But what the hell is doing this with the emo tag??Yeah,emocore roots start from hardcore punk but it's a different genre.Even the first emo bands didn't play true hardcore.
• Post-hardcore scene started from hardcore punk.But Alesana isn't hardcore.According to your explanation that means they're not post-hardcore??Yeah, right.

Xr 1 19:44, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

It seems most of us do agree with the fact that they are NOT a post-hardcore band. I want to find sources that say they aren't post-hardcore... Oh wait... Yeah, that's not gunna happen. To be honest, I read the Wikipedia article to find out about the band, because I like Post-Hardcore... but I was dissapointed in the fact that they are not one. Post-Hardcore would be like Project 86 (especially their earlier stuff). Also, about being known... I guess this band is known, but if someone here says they aren't well known, then are they notable enough for Wikipedia (I say yes but...). Screamo fits them better than Post-Hardcore - Post-Hardcore doesn't fit them at all. Where are the sources for them being post-hardcore? Their record label? Their record label also did The Aquabats and other non Post-Hardcore bands, so don't use that. That's like saying Tooth and Nail Records does only Christian music (the majority is, but not all of them). There are more websites stating they are screamo (or emo) than anything else. Also, this is not your page, Ambrosia-, AngelofSadness. You two may think they are post-hardcore, but they are not. Like one of you said before, Wikipedia is not a place to type what you "think." Find a source stating they are post-hardcore and they will be put into thatcategory. There are more sources stating that they are screamo/emo than anythign else. If you fail to find a reliable, non-biased source, then the genre will be changed to the appropriate one. YES, the wikipedia article states that post-hardcore can incorprate screaming into their music. So does Screamo. So does Metal. Post-Hardcore usess heavy riffs and what you could call a "thick Bass" or "heavy bass." The article states these as Post-Hardcore bands: Post-hardcore also includes bands with decidedly art rock leanings such as Fugazi, Drive Like Jehu, Bear vs. Shark, Rapeman, Shellac, Big Black, Quicksand, Hot Water Music, Helmet, Glassjaw, Far, At the Drive-In, and Thrice. Alesana does not sound like them. Screamo does "loud-to-soft" post hardcore generally does NOT. Also, if their myspace is nto a credible source, it should be taken OFF the page. I don't even see refreences on the page, so beware that someone will tag it for deletion or change this up alot more. Their own website states they are Emo/Pop Punk. http://www.alesanarock.com/ click Band. I have added them to the genre that their WEBSITE says, not what you think they are. IronCrow 01:43, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Just so you know, Ironcrow, I don't listen to this band at all. I only have this page on my watchlist in case a long term sockpuppet returns(the person who's comments I was replying to on the talkpage back in July). He comes back every now and again, and I was just asking for sources because he would not stop changing the genre of numerous articles without a reason/source or discussion. I got him to discuss it, hence the sections below in all caps. If you want great sources regarding the genre, find an interview with the band themselves discussing the genre. One of the most asked questions to musical artists is "describe your music" and so it shouldn't be too hard to find. If not try a big music magazine like rolling stone or something. AngelOfSadness talk 21:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

If you don't listen to them at all, then why do you put it into the post-hardcore genre? Their website is the most reliable thing, and points toward what they are. There is no reason to list them as a genre to settle a dispute. They are not Post-Hardcore and have little, if any, influences of that genre. There are no sources stating that they are post-hardcore. There are stating they are emo/screamo, however, even if they are unreliable, it is something. HOWEVER, I do see what you are saying, sorta. Also, about interviews, I can find few, and that question hasn't really been asked. IronCrow 21:40, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Actually I never typed that in, I probably reverted the edits of the sockpuppet(And three reports, three times it was confirmed) to whatever was there and chances are post-hardcore was there already. I was just trying to get him to discuss the changes on the talkpage first before changing, that's all. He did the exact same thing with thirty other articles and attacked other editors over it. I was just concerned in getting him to calm down as he seemed out of control. Anyway, that was three months ago and an experience that I wish to forget. You can put whatever you want into the genre of this article just as long as it's sourced. And of course the other main editors of the article agree with it :D AngelOfSadness talk 21:56, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Ok, I see, thanks for clearing that up. I was so confused I had to listen to their songs again to make sure I wasn't missing anything. They aren't my favorite band, and they get old, but... meh... The genre I stuck up there are what matches with what is aligned with their website, even though I don't agree with their genre as on the website, but I can't do a thing about it. Thanks again. IronCrow 22:06, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry you weren't missing anything. I just remembered that finding specific interviews with the band discussing genre isn't easy when researching it but if you look up some fansites, fansites are a great source of interviews and link that page to the article. Yes the only thing fansites are good for is interviews, many of them give sources as to where they got the interview originally from and then you could link that website instead. Anyway I hope you find what you're looking for and if you need any additional help, you can always leave a message on my talkpage. Happy Editing Everyone! :D AngelOfSadness talk 22:14, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I would... but they don't have a good fansite... It states they blend metal... that's like saying 50 cent is country... meh, how it is now is good. Website is more reliable. IronCrow 22:37, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Are you meaning to say that 50 cent isn't country? :D I meant fansite a lot of the time aren't good because point of view etc, but a few of them have interviews as magazine scans/youtube interviews. You can't link to the magazine scans/youtube links themselves as of breach of copyright but you can reference them e.g "Interview with Alesana in issue 1223 of Kerrang" or "Interview with Alesana episode 46 of Whatever Rock Show You Want To Insert Here:D". There's a way to format them properly for the references section. But referencing them like this is better than linking them to copyrighted material. AngelOfSadness talk 23:00, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Just because a band doesn't sound like another band within the genre does not mean they are not. Are you saying that Hot Cross isn't a hardcore punk band because they don't sound like Bad Brains? Jet (band) isn't rock because they don't sound like Led Zeppelin? As well, their website only states that they attract audiences of emo/pop punk. No where does it say the band plays that genre of music. ~Ambrosia- ^talk 00:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Actually it does. They have NO elements of Post-Hardcore whatsoever. They have so many elements of Screamo it's ridiculous that it isn't in taht genre. Just because YOU think the genre is Post-Hardcore means nothing. You have no sources WHATSOEVER that they are post-hardcore. Even if their purevolume and myspace are not reliable, they are the ONLY sources stating their genre, which is emo/screamo, a genre we all dissagree with. Therefore, you are wrong in displaying what their genre is. Do you even know what a Post-HArdcore band is? They are NOTHING like this band, nothing. And the Bad Brains example was a horrible example, Hardcore punk takes many different forms, as post-hardcore is more of an extended subgenre, tehrefore, does not. Their website says NOTHING about post-hardcore. They attract audiences that love the emo/pop punk scene, yes. Now, before you edit this page again, give me SOURCES stating they are POST-HARDCORE and if it is unbiased and agreeable, then the edit will revert. Again, YOU think it is post-hardcore, you do not have SOURCES at all. Naming them as post-hardcore because of their record label is not a way to do things. There is more evidense to state that they are SCREAMO than post-hardcore. You are not the official spokesperson for the band or whatever. Again, YOU think they are Post-Hardcore, no one else does. DO NOT change it back to post-hardcore, else we want mediation, and that process annoys me. You show a certain bias for them being post-hardcore. That is fine, just don't bring that to Wikipedia. And Screamo is NOT a redundant genre. Redundant would be Rock, Metal, pop, they want specifics. You DO NOT own this article, YOu do not choose what genre they are, therefore, before you make another edit to state that they are Post-Hardcore, FIND SOURCES, even if the sources are a little biased, that's ok, because at least they are better than purevolume or myspace. IronCrow 18:15, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

"You have no sources WHATSOEVER that they are post-hardcore." - where are yours?

"Just because YOU think the genre is Post-Hardcore means nothing." - just because you think they are screamo and emo means nothing.

"Do you even know what a Post-HArdcore band is? They are NOTHING like this band, nothing." - personal opinion, take it elsewhere

"Now, before you edit this page again, give me SOURCES stating they are POST-HARDCORE and if it is unbiased and agreeable, then the edit will revert." - umm, where are yours?

"Again, YOU think it is post-hardcore, you do not have SOURCES at all." Contradict yourself more

"Naming them as post-hardcore because of their record label is not a way to do things. There is more evidense to state that they are SCREAMO than post-hardcore." - I don't recall mentioning record labels whatsoever, and where's this evidence?

"You are not the official spokesperson for the band or whatever." - are you the official spokesperson for post-hardcore? lulz

"Again, YOU think they are Post-Hardcore, no one else does." - it's been post-hardcore for months, I think that means something

"You DO NOT own this article, YOu do not choose what genre they are, therefore, before you make another edit to state that they are Post-Hardcore, FIND SOURCES, even if the sources are a little biased, that's ok, because at least they are better than purevolume or myspace." - right back at you.

Seriously, take a look at and look at many bands that you would not consider "post-hardcore" by YOUR standards. Seriously. ~Ambrosia- ^talk 18:53, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

For one thing, most of those have already been answered. I never said you said that they were post-hardcore because of the label, I was saying they are not because of this, in case one would find that as a reason. I already said I do not have good sources, I said I have the ONLY sources. You have none. The bands listed on the Post-Hardcore page suit me just fine, because the ones listed on that page ARE post-hardcore. And finally, that last statement was uncalled for and certainly immature. Just further shows your bias. If you wish to make Wikipedia a better place, then do not act as such and please, please do not do as you have done, it makes this place look bad. If anything, do not stoop to trolling, please. You are almost touching that borderline. IronCrow 20:21, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

So, although Alesana bears significant resemblance to bands like Aiden, Drop Dead, Gorgeous and Hawthorne Heights, they aren't post-hardcore? Calling me immature further shows your bias, lewlers. The last comment was merely a joke, sorry I offended you. You can have as many sources as you want, if they're not credible they mean squat. I could merely say their Purevolume states that they are post-hardcore as it is the first genre mentioned. Another source also states that are post-hardcore, although that not mean it is credible and here's another. ~Ambrosia- ^talk 02:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm not going to keep arguing with you about this. You also kind of copied my sentence there, and I don't think you meant that as a joke, nor was that last comment a joke. Even if it was, it's not for discussion. You are still showing bias... again... And again, there are still more sources, even if they do mean "squat." IronCrow 04:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

I don't see why you keep bringing up this "more sources" argument. You could have millions of dollars in Monopoly money, that doesn't mean it's valid. Don't give me that bias crap, you're doing the exact same thing. Seriously, compare a screamo band like Envy (band) or Orchid (band) to them and tell me they belong in the same genre. Screamo and emo are terms tossed around that many people do not know the true meaning of.

By the way, my sources (and I am just going to assume the first genre mentioned would be the most relevant one): [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]

Since the Wikipedia article on screamo is pretty much vague as hell, I think I'll toss this in here and I'm changing the genre to post-hardcore since the band's official site biography describes them as in the "post-hardcore scene". ~Ambrosia- ^talk 01:44, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for providing a source. Though I still believe they are Screamo (Not Emo, Post-Hardcore), and even though they do not fit the post-hardcore definition, you do have a source, however, I have also added them to the Emo genre as well, since your source states they are also emo: http://www.punknews.org/review/6674 Apparently, you are the one who is biased, using a source while not including BOTH the genres it states. Do you have a bias against this band being labeled Emo? Also, I am not biased on this subject. By the way, your monopoly money example was a bad one. I love Screamo AND post-hardcore, and I do not care what genre they consider themselves. But a Hardcore Emo band is what...? Anyways, like I said, I do NOT think they are Emo but I put it in the article, didn't I? How am I being biased if you provided NO sources at the time, when I had at least 2 (not-so-good ones). Also, if the two sources I had were not good enough, then that would be an abuse of Wikipedia Notability. Also, Punknews.org isn't a good source. It is a sources that can be used, but a good source, no. They are probably one of the most biased review sites out there. Now, I also want to bring to mind your tone. Wikipedia Talk pages are not to be used in the tone you have used. Talk pages are relaxed and professional. I mean no offense, however, you are being quite angry with me over a little subject, a band's genre of all things. Please note that you have already abused NPOV issues. Now, I'm going to say this once: Your source of Punknews.org says they are EMO and POST-HARDCORE, you put down only post hardcore because it said it first? Not right. That is biased. It says both, they BOTH are to be used then. Second, don't use a childish tone with me or any other fellow Wikipedian. If you dislike anyone, that's fine, do not impose on me with your dislike because I do not care for it and niether do others. Also, remember that when you use sources, especially on music, use all of what it says. A band can be Hardcore/metal and Rap (Rapcore) but if you just put Hardcore or metal, what is that saying? Finally, Like I said before, I could care less what genre they see themselves as. I am not trying to keep "Screamo" or "Emo" or whatever up there. As you can tell, I've changed it quite a bit, you are the only one who wants a single genre to be up there and stay up there. Please do not see this as me bashing you, and again (repeating myself, aren't I?) I mean no offense. But when the hundreds of people who view this page see the label as "post-hardcore" and expect "post-hardcore," they look down a bit on Wikipedia as a whole. It's like looking at the Ghandi page saying he wasn't a vegetarian, when it's clear he was. Anyways, the genres on the page now are there as is until someone can find a source saying they are another genre, chaged genre, or whatever. IronCrow 02:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Punknews.org is user-submitted articles, so until you find a reliable source, it's staying as post-hardcore. My tone of writing has nothing to do with this talk page, stop making irrelevant comments because I could really care less if I sound like a child and by saying so, you are clearly trying to provoke me. If you read the page, my source is their band bio, not Punknews. Their page bio doesn't state that they are emo, it states they are a band in the post-hardcore scene. It states that "fans of emo are drawn to...", not that they are an emo band. It also states that metal fans are drawn to their music, but they are quite far from. ~Ambrosia- ^talk 22:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

You just gave me... nevermind. Provoke you? To do what? Make an edit? Silly. Their website says they are into the post-hardcore scene, and the emo scene (when it says groups are drawn to it, it generally means a scene, ie., Norma Jean draws into the hardcore punk scene when it is Metalcore, a fusion of Hardcore punk and extremem metal)... By definition these guys aren't post-hardcore, really at all. They sound like a cookie-cutter screamo band (give me some screamo bands that don't sound like them). Oh well, I don't even know why I am arguing over a page that doesn't even meet Wikipedia notability guidlines (All we have here is myspace, purevolume, their website, and a couple of sentences). By the way, keep the deletion tag up until an administrator decides it's good enough to stay. The article has nothing and notability hasn't been seen. Unless you can improve the article with multiple sources or reasosn that it should be up there, the tag should stay for 5 days. Remember you MUST DISCUSS before taking the tag down, that is, you cannot take it down until it has been decided. " You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to its deletion for any reason. To avoid confusion, it helps to explain why you object to the deletion, either in the edit summary or on the talk page." By the way, it is being discussed here for why/why not: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Alesana IronCrow 01:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Knock yourself out. So, I'm guessing we should add heavy metal to their genre, as well. lolz. International tour dates can be found at [15]. As well, they are on Fearless Records, a large indie label that has been around for 10+ years and has had notable acts such as the Aquabats and Plain White T's. ~Ambrosia- ^talk 03:34, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Heavy Metal... bad example of poor sarcasm (By the way, heavy metal is not metalcore like Killswitch Engage if you have no idea what that is, Stryper is heavy metal. I have to tell you this because you seem to not know genres). This is the dumbest argument over a band's genre I've ever argued about, and I give up. And who cares if their label is notable? Not all the bands signed to Tooth and Nail Records are notable even though their record label is what, 20 years old, have/had many popular bands like Anberlin, Emery, The Juliana Theory Oh well, I wont be the last to argue over this. I still know they are Screamo. Post-hardcore is just absurd to put them under, and anyone who is a fan of post-hardcore have probably already noticed (albeit without care). You apparently have no idea what post-hardcore is. Listen to other post-hardcore bands and you'd see. Have yourself a good time with this one. I'll pull it off my watch list, since your apparently the king/queen of this page. All hail? IronCrow 22:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Apologies. Though I still feel as though they are definitly NOT post-hardcore, I seem to have been stonewalling a bit. I'll just say it's non-wikipedia reasons lately. Nevertheless, this is an apology for being rude (correct, in my opinion, but rude). IronCrow 22:05, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Reliable sources are credible published materials with a reliable publication process; their authors are generally regarded as trustworthy, or are authoritative in relation to the subject at hand.

The reliability of a source depends on context; what is reliable in one topic may not be in another. A world-renowned mathematician may not be a reliable source on topics of biology. In general, a topic should use the most reliable sources available to its editors.

Read the guidelines and policies of Wikipedia before you start telling me all this BS. I'm not just pulling this out of my ass. Ambrosia- 14:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Just to let everyone know I am related to one of the two founding members of alesana. They came up with the term sweetcore to describe their music. In fact when they released their first album on tragic hero records they had a few hundred alesana shirts made with xoxo sweetcore on the front and a heart with our area code 919 on the back. They also have described themselves as screamo emo and post hardcore as well especially since myspace doesn't allow you to type in SweetCore. ~meckface —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meckface (talk • contribs) 19:07, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

THEY ARE EMO

LOOK AT THEIR myspace page! there stands: Screamo / Emo! so there are a emocore band! and not post-hardcore! don't think that every emo band are a posthardcore band

SCREAMO/EMO

look at thei MYSPACE PAGE!! www.myspace.com/alesana

It is known that most myspaces of bands are not actually run by the bands themselves so how can you call that a reliable resource? Especially for something like genre. The current genre is a broad genre to explain the music of the band. Whereas screamo/emo is not and causes people to disagree. Angel Of Sadness ^T/C 17:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, to be exact, it's not only their myspace that states it, but purevolume as well. To be honest I don't care. BUT They do sound Screamo, not Emo, and definitly NOT Post-Hardcore. Has anyone here ever listen to Post-Hardcore? Wikipedia says this about Screamo: "Characteristic of the genre are "loud-to-soft" (sometimes chaotic) dynamics, harmonized guitars with fast-paced riffs and twinkly melodic breaks, frantic/abrasive shouting or screaming, angry/abstract/introspective lyrics, low-end production, and exceptionally energetic live shows." They aren't emocore, post-hardcore, etc. IronCrow 01:30, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

SAETIA,ENVY,TEXTBOOK TRAITORS LA QUIETE those are screamo bands

EMO THE SECOND

MAN!! THIS BAND LOOKS LIKE EMOS AND THEY SOUND REALY LIKE THEM!! ALRIGHT WHY ARE THEY NOT SCREAMO/EMO AND WHY ARE THEY POST-HARDCORE? GIVE ME SOME REASONS!! PLEASE

Since the main editors of the article have left it like this for so long, why should it be changed to suit you? Obviously there is going to be a debate over genre, as there is with every single band listed on wikipedia. With the genre you are mentioning, you are actually pigeon-holing the band. The current genre was decided on probably when the article was made. Better to leave the genre as it is until someone else like a main constuctive contributor of this article decides to voice their views on this matter. Angel Of Sadness ^T/C 17:36, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Alesana are not hardcore punk. ~Ambrosia- ^talk 01:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

i think they sounds more like Screamo and on their myspace page is written Screamo / Emo

Once again most MySpaces are not run by the bands themselves and therefore are not reliable sources. If it's on the bands official website (not official myspace), fine.Angel Of Sadness ^T/C 12:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Not to mention a statement that starts with "i think..." isn't for Wikipedia. ~Ambrosia- ^talk 04:17, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

"::Alesana are not hardcore punk. ~Ambrosia- ^talk 01:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC) " Emocore evoluted from hardcore.So emocore is not hardcore.But as I can see some people don't understand it... Emocore is part of the post-hardcore scene.So keep this. Today there are maybe no bands that make music that is classified as emo by the old fans...and they call them post-hardcore. As avout the mainstream 'emo' bands - they are alternative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.87.6.72 (talk) 18:46, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

Ambrosia- For those who keep adding screamo to genre, please read the screamo page.

189.173.57.53 00:12, 18 January 2007 (UTC)can you add the new cover art and the new track listing On Frail Wings of Vanity and Wax?

Ambrosia- 00:36, 26 January 2007 (EST) Done.

Seriously WHAT IN MAN'S SAKE IS UP WITH "YES WIKI" THINKS POST-HARDCORE. ENOUGH! First of all I don't give a care if you name: My Chem, Fall Out Boy or The CUre but how is Post-hardcore considered credible on techni all it fits in cause of less riff or maybe downer sound! Alesana have on there website SCREAMO so THEY ARE SCREAMO cause they say they are SCREAMO yet you argue against the band and yet you guys can't give a single example on Screamo. Kindly I ask what is a screamo band ( you guys must know at least one being so sure)? Alesana wear make up like I dunno other punk bands but maybe thats a emo thing not so called non-conforming. --ForsakenPoppet (talk) 03:23, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

A good example of a screamo band is Saetia. I see references to screamo on the official site, but no actual naming. I don't see how make up fits in with the genretising of a band, but OK. And your argument on credibility makes absolutely no sense. ~Ambrosia- ^talk 21:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Screamo is described as "sonic thrash". Does Alesana sound like sonic thrash? Not to me it doesn't. All Music isn't even a decent source. -- FatalError (t|c) 03:16, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Reviews

The album reviews I have cited are independent, third-party publications by reasonably well-known online webzines. They are media sources of which the band is the primary subject and serve to substantiate the claim to notability per WP:MUSIC bullet 1. I believe that the user is deleting them because the sources do not have their own Wikipedia article; however, if anything, a review site like The Trades is more professional than a review site like punknews.org. These publications are vetted review sites, and I am willing to look at them on a case-by-case basis if there is a serious claim that they are not. Please do so. Chubbles (talk) 16:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Regardless many are SPS and therefore fail WP:V. It doesnt matter whether you believe they are 'well known' they must be verfiable. They are being deleted because a) they fail verfiablilty b) it's unecessary to have that many citations and it leads me to believe that they are being added solely for advertising and promoting the websites. The trades is borderline so i will leave it but http://www.saintrocknroll.com/ definetly is SP and fails WP:V. In fact the whole sentence should go as it is pure original research. --neonwhite user page talk 21:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

SR&R, I can understand; the site's information about itself is paltry. Noting that an album got mixed reviews is hardly original research. Chubbles (talk) 22:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

If there is no source that says it got mixed reviews then it is original research. The fact that the reviews were mixed is an editor's personal point of view not the view of a verified source as required. --neonwhite user page talk 02:24, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

This is a characteristic abuse of the original research policy, indicative of a misunderstanding of the uses of primary and secondary sources. But I'll be damned if it's worth fighting over. I've had enough of this article, already. If it makes you feel better, you may feel free to change the word "mixed" to "several". Chubbles (talk) 03:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)