User talk:Luk
[[
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
I will usually reply on your talk page if you sign your comments by typing ~~~~ at the end.
If you can, please undo my action (even if it's a deletion or a block) and notify me, I'll double check later.
No Problem
Oh it's not a problem you don't need to worry about it. I didn't need to do much anyway.- User:Ezekiel of Howdypedia 8:46 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Happy Admin Day Lucas!
| Happy Adminship | from the Birthday Committee | |
|---|---|---|
  Wishing Luk a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! | ||
Best wishes from Canada! ;-) --RobNS 21:24, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks guys :)
I admit I completely missed I was playing whack-a-mole for 1 yeah already! Thanks :) -- lucasbfr talk 06:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
CU query
Hi, Lucasbfr; Wellwater conspiracy is listed twice at Checkuser, and I'm not sure if I did the right thing by moving Jokeshow back to Outstanding Requests (from Completed requests) when I added a party. Do you have time to have a look? Thanks, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:25, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Woops thanks for noticing... I was wondering why it was not transcluded already :D. Your move sounds good. We don't often do it, but there's no rule :) -- lucasbfr talk 21:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Me again ... why was Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jokeshow moved to completed, when the additional party hasn't been completed? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Woops (again!), we all missed it! I poked thatcher. When you add something after the CU looked at the case, it's safer to drop him a note because he might miss something was added afterwards. -- lucasbfr talk 13:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Checkuser Request
Hey Lucasbfr.
Thank you for your attention concerning possible sockpuppets of user:Lycander's Aim. I provided the "diff" s that you requested and some of the edits are pretty subtle. when you will see them you will understand. I hope you will take care of it soon. You can go there using this link [1]
Thank you.--Anna polly (talk) 16:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you Lucasbfr ! you made an enormous effort. Blocking so many sockpuppets is not an easy task. Most of them sounded familiar and their edits were very similar. I'm just speechless. Even Grinkov and Kotlyarov, they were always getting on my nerves but I would never imagine that it would actually be from the same computer , Ip or whatever it was. These people definitely have a lot of free time : ) --Anna polly (talk) 13:36, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Recent Blocking
Hi.
Can you tell me why this user was blocked? It appears that he only made non-harmful (and only 5) test edits to British Arabs, for which he was not warned. If this user was sockpuppeting, there should be a valid discussion before blocking and a template to put up afterwards. If I am being a dumbass (as I am known to do) and missing something obvious, please tell me. Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) Sorry, read the relevant discussion. Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 22:26, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- The sockpupetry is quite averred, I am not tagging him yet since there is a debate on who the master of that batch is. :) -- lucasbfr talk 22:54, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Where is the debate located? I'd love to contribute...Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 23:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 50
It may not be weekly, but Wikipedia Weekly has finally reached Episode 50! Listen or download MP3 and OGG versions at the episode's page.
- Have a comment about the episode? You can leave your comment right on the episode's page!
- Miss an episode? Catch up in the Wikipedia Weekly archives at wikipediaweekly.org!
- Know someone who would love Wikipedia Weekly? Tell them about it!
- Care to participate in a podcast? Sign up here!
For the Wikipedia Weekly team, WODUPbot 00:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
You're receiving this because you're listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.