Talk:Movladi Udugov
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | Biography Stub‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
Neutrality
It's not very neutral to call the chechen seperatist faction a very unpopular islamist faction, and that that is the reason Udugov lost the election. First of all the seperatists have heavy support in the chechen people and more recruits than they have resources to handle. Second they are not a radical islamist group who wishes to impose a radical islamistic regime in Chechnya, their present leader Doku Umarov has stated that this is not jihad and they are not mujahedins, it is a war for freedom. But my main complaint is that it isn't neutral to call them a very unpopular islamist faction.
I share the concerns of the anonymous editor above: "unpopular radical Islamist platform" is not NPOV. If unpopular as in low in numbers, this can be easily reworded. I'm not familiar with the topic - could we have a bit of discussion as to whom he was representing, and a more NPOV-friendly summary of the party? Cricketgirl 18:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
"Chechen international Islamic Internet agency"
Could someone more familiar with the subject edit this sentence (under Second Chechen War) so it is clearer to those of us unfamiliar with the topic? Thanks Cricketgirl 19:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Copyedit
Fair use rationale for Image:MovladiUdugov.jpg
Image:MovladiUdugov.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Udugov won't mind what we do with photos of him. He's the propaganda boss of a Salafist fantasy-emirate. Since Muhammad didn't care about copyrights, neither does Udugov.
Neutrality, you say? The grossly dishonest Kavkaz website, from which some of the so-called references come, was founded by and is operated by Movladi Udugov himself.
Honestly, where Islamist aggression and terrorism is concerned, Wikipedia is just one more washroom wall, plastered with graffiti.
