User talk:TheFarix

Archives

Notability Tag Spamming

Why are you spamming so many h-anime articles with the notability tag? Many of which, it seems, are perfectly as notable as any movie or TV series (Lyon Flare, Angel of Darkness, Beat Angel Escalayer).

Template: Anime Voices Doc

Are you the one who moved the Anime Voices Doc to it's own page? If so, is there a way to make a similar page to the Video game voices template? Rtkat3 (talk) 12;34, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

You can do so by add {{Documentation, template}} to the bottom of the template. {{anime voices}} still, however, needs some more work, but the time I can dedicate to Wikipedia is limited. --Farix (Talk) 17:30, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Shugo Chara! episodes

Thank you for revising about List of Shugo Chara! episodes, but I think ep47 should Am I Utau's Manager!? is better because this case of Japanese is an interrogative. What do you think? --Yakuchang ....(talk) 14:50, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've thought about this before responding. If it was purely an interrogative statement, then "Am I" would be more appropriate. However, the title has an exclamation point at the end, which makes it an exclamatory statement. It that case, "I'm" or "I am" would be grammatically correct and "Am I" would be incorrect. The question mark that follows the exclamation point emphasizes that the statement was said in shock instead of it being a question. --Farix (Talk) 05:06, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for a kind answer. Please revise my poor English from now on, too. --Yakuchang ....(talk) 05:32, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Shugo Chara - Easter.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Shugo Chara - Easter.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:21, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History of anime & manga importance

Those articles should really be top-importance. They being subarticles of anime and manga shouldn't matter much since they are core articles. --Mika1h (talk) 19:58, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not only do I disagree with you, but this is also backed by the consensus decision made at Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Assessment. --Farix (Talk) 20:12, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just can't understand how history of anime/manga can be of less importance than any individual person or company. --Mika1h (talk) 21:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox animanga/Manga

I just wanted to drop a quick note to explain why I reverted your July 29th edit of the Manga infobox[1]. On I Saw It, a one-shot from 1972, I realized the infobox was listing it its release as "1972 – ongoing". Checking back, I realized your edit was causing it, so I reverted it to fix the issue. -- [[::User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[::User talk:Collectonian|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Collectonian|contribs]]) 04:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

That's because one-shots should be using the published field instead of first. I have fixed the problem on the article and restored the template. --Farix (Talk) 10:33, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May also want to update the instructions :P -- [[::User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[::User talk:Collectonian|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Collectonian|contribs]]) 14:07, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Virgin Fleet

The Virgin Fleet article I am making may need more references, and may need expansion. Help me out! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who's ever played Eduard Friedrich Mörike's opera "Eduard auf dem Seil" ?

Hi, I'm looking for Eduard Friedrich Mörike's opera "Eduard auf dem Seil" (according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silpelit), but I can find any information, who ever has played it. If do you know any link to the information about performance this opera please drop me an e-mail at fazoo@o2.pl, because it seems till now, that nobody's played it ever. It's really important for me so I'd be thankful for any information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.9.92.72 (talk) 06:20, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Feature requests for template

We have discussed a few requirements for {{WikiProject Anime and manga}} at its talk page, would you mind having a look please? Regards, G.A.S 06:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anime voices more

I'm a little confused as to why you redirected {{Anime voices more}} to {{Anime voices}}. I realize it probably hadn't seen much use and I never got around to writing the docs, but you could have at least told me you were going to redirect it. Its purpose was for when multiple voice actors play the same part (like for when a character is sometimes shown as a child). Without it one has to use two (or more) Anime voices templates which ends up adding an extra "Voiced by:" in the middle of the line. I was going to use it on List of characters in The Twelve Kingdoms#Kouya and List of characters in The Twelve Kingdoms#Taiki when I discovered it had been redirected. Would it be alright to unredirect it or add a way to turn off the "Voiced by:" part in Anime voices? Thank you. --Eruhildo (talk) 04:56, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since the automatic wikilink is disabled if the fields are not a valid article name, there is no point in having the other template any more. You can now put more then one VA into a language field. --Farix (Talk) 22:43, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oh yeah, I completely forgot about that. ^_^;; Sorry for the trouble. --Eruhildo (talk) 04:58, 4 September 2008 (UTC)~~[reply]

Just tried it out and realized that's not what I'm trying to do. I want it to appear in the format:

''Voiced by:'' [[Seiyū 1]] (Japanese), [[VA 1]] (English) (role 1), [[Seiyū 2]] (Japanese), [[VA 2]] (English) (role 2)

This could easily be implemented in the current template without adding much extra code. I think I'll write up some stuff tomorrow and post it on the template's talk page to see what other people think. --Eruhildo (talk) 05:10, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is best not to flip back and forth between Japanese VAs and English VAs. That format is also a bit confusing. I would also suggest that it may be an instance where sentences are better and less ambiguous. --Farix (Talk) 11:34, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anime St. Louis

Hello, you helped us out a lot a while back with maintaining and repealing the vandalism to our page. Unfortunately a large amount of our business is still tied up in legal matters, but we're working to resolve them with the utmost haste. In the meantime, it would seem that some people have taken it upon themselves to repeatedly vandalize our article, linking the previous, and no longer used website. It is my personal opinion that this is in a direct attempt to misuse our good name and harm our organization.

I myself am a novice Wikipedia editor at best, and the rest of our convention staff know little next to me. I was curious if you could help us out with this matter, by either taking whatever action necessary to block the vandal, or get a Protected status on our page. I attempted to myself, but was utterly confused at the process.

Either way, your aforementioned help has already been greatly appreciated, and it would be doing us a great service if you would endeavor this task as well.

My thanks, --Fatebringer (talk) 04:22, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have placed a warning on the IP's talk page and directed him or her to discuss the matter either on the article's talk page or on the Anime Conventions Mailing List. If the editor persists, I can add the article to my watch list. --Farix (Talk) 12:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Hopefully this will be enough to discourage further acts of vandalism. --Fatebringer (talk) 16:37, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guilt by association?

A Pastor says nice things about a congregant, ant is "guilt by association"? You have very strange ideation.Elan26 (talk) 21:58, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Elan26[reply]

Because Larry Kroon praise of Sarah Palin has nothing to do with Kroon himself and didn't belong in the article in the first place. The only reason to include that text is to associate Palin with Kroon, then the rest of the article attempts to paint Kroon as a anti-Semite. This creates the impression that Palin is an anti-Semite by association. Also, judging by your edit history, it is clear that you are attempting to push a particular POV in articles related to Sarah Palin. --Farix (Talk) 22:41, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wasilla Assembly of God

I was in the process of adding a comment to the talk page of Wasilla Assembly of God when it was deleted. Based on your comment to me about them being different, I left a request for review on the deleted admin's page, User talk:AuburnPilot. If I was wrong, sorry in advance. justinfr (talk/contribs) 01:49, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

auburnpilot went back to check. They were basically the same only under different names. * Whew * :) justinfr (talk/contribs) 01:54, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, sorry about the mixup. I've just read the extended conversation on his talk page. I can't keep all of these Palin articles straight.......! justinfr (talk/contribs) 02:03, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was a real mess. Though I think that the article on Wasilla Bible Church could have been salvaged by removing all of the coatracks and stubifing it. I though that there were enough reliable sources to pass the notability criteria. --Farix (Talk) 02:08, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wasilla assembly of god

I am a retired mathematician formerly at Stanford unfamiliar with Wikipedia publication standards.

About fifteen people, including yourself, made conributions to the Wasilla Assembly of God article. Similarly, a number corrected and sourced Larry Kroon and Ed Kalnins, including articles with them prior to Palin being nominated.

The revisions were made per the suggestions.

How was it and related articles completely deleted without warning?EricDiesel (talk) 01:55, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was the one who nominated Wasilla Assembly of God for deletion because it was essentially the same content as other Wasilla church articles, only with a different name. There have been repeated messages left on your talk page with links to WP policies, which you would do well to read. The most important one is WP:NOTABILITY. The consensus among other editors is that these church articles do not meet the notability criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia. The problem isn't with the articles; it's that the subject isn't well-known enough--outside of its association with Sarah Palin--to be included in an encyclopedia. justinfr (talk/contribs) 02:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another one to read is WP:COAT. The church articles are basically cover for discussing Sarah Palin, and so such content would better be covered on her own page. justinfr (talk/contribs) 02:01, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wasilla Bible Church now links to Wasilla. I think there should be consistency constancy with Wasilla Assembly of God, but only if information about the churches, which is NOT about Palin, is allowed to go there. Therefore, IF that could be assured, I would not object to deleting this page and directing Wasilla Assembly of God to Wasilla. Alternatively, recreating the pages for Kroon and Kalnins would do it. A number of national news stories are about sermons referring to events of 2003, 2004, and 2005, AFTER Palin left the church. Therefore, they do not belong on a Palin site. There should be some place for this information to go. If you speak Hebrew, check out the mass of stuff on Wasilla Bible Church. They are going nuts over the “Terrorist attacks on Israelis being justified as God’s Punishment on the Jews”. This would be true even if Palin had not been there to hear it. If it turned out that Palin was not there, the news stories would sill grow and grow. In addition, the Iranian and Iraqi press is starting to weigh in on Wasilla Assembly of God because of its “God is backing the US in invading and occupying Iraq” (their words). None of this concerns Palin, as she had nothing to do with it. I think putting all this stuff about the actions of the two churches on Wasilla will lead to objections that it should be on the churches articles, as it has to do with the churches and not Wasilla. I still think each should have their own article, so Wasilla does not become a coat rack (am I getting the concept?) for information about the churches. Thanks for the time. EricDiesel (talk) 04:31, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changed Edit per your Suggestion

Thanks. You were right on point, and if I left it without your edit it likely would have created problems. I changed the edit per your comment. If you have time, I would appreciate it if you could check my change. I summarixed ove 600 news articles, and gleamed all of the ones that were about Wasilla Assembly of God, and not ONLY about that Palin was a member.

(Interestingly, if Palin was a member in 2002, why do the churches sermons that are from after 2003, 2004 and 2005 the only ones in the news stories. Seems like news is trying to tar Palin with stuff about the church, when she was not even there.)

I don't think there will be much more on Palin popping up hereon this page, as I was pretty complete. But there are over 15,000 web pages on the church, so the article will likely grow as the church becomes one of the most studied churches in history. I am looking forward to the speaking and singing in toungues videotaoes, sure to come. I loved the videotapes of Obama's church, but lets wait until the church music comes up on video, another near sure thing. Thats theh best part of any church.

Thanks. EricDiesel (talk) 04:11, 6 September 2008 (UTC)EricDiesel (talk) 04:04, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE - This is still a coathanger and it is not about the church

1. How are the Iranian and Iraqui news media articles about the church's God and killing Iraq policy not about the church?

2. How is an ABC news story about a church website shutting down not about the church?

3. How are reports of remarks made after Palin left the church not about the church?

4. Where should this information boiled down from the over 600 news articles go, if not here? It is not about Palin. And the Kalnin article was closed. An ABC News story on the shutdown of a church webpage does not even belong on a Kalnins article even if it were put back up. Thnx EricDiesel (talk) 04:41, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First off, don't remove my replies FROM MY OWN TALKPAGE. That is extremely uncivil. Second, all of your edits have been been about attaching some form of controversy to Sarah Palin visa the churches she has attended. Not only is that WP:COATRACKing, but it also indicates that you are pushing a particular point of view. I advice that you step away from this issue and edit other articles that are completely unrelated to Palin and not make any edits on politics or controversy. If you continue your current course, you will eventually be blocked for POV pushing. --Farix (Talk) 12:59, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what replies I removed, but if I did, it was in error and I apologize.
1. The information on WBChurch is not a coathanger. Palin is not even mentioned. The international buzz on the church predates Palin's nomination. The church became notable because of the television images of the bulldozer, and Jewish antidefamation groups reacting to the assertion, by a decades old internationally controversial group, blaming Jews for being victims of terror attacks only because they would not convert to Christianity. Palin is completely unrelated to this controversy, and there is no mention of her in the short addition. The person who made the last edit to include is a pro Palin partisan and evengelical Christian, I am not, and we are in complete agreement on this. Palin having been present is NOT mentioned, and the international controversay I cite predates her nomination. Please indicate WHY you think something is a coathanger. Thanks.EricDiesel (talk) 15:46, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
2. My last edits do not push a POV. In fact, I am the ONLY editor on WAoG who has included that due to her having left in 2002, and the references of the WAoG sermons were from 2003 and beyond, so she could not have been there and so the content of the controversial sermons should NOT be on her page, since this is pure guilt by associatioin. You have no idea what my politics are. WHAT is the POV I am pushing? EricDiesel (talk) 15:55, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Christian denomination‎

Thanks for your edits to Template:Infobox Christian denomination‎. It's now quite comprehensive. Blarneytherinosaur ^gabby? 01:37, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The problem on List of anime conventions

The problem on handling List of anime conventions:

Hong Kong: ACGHK, Asian Game Show(zh:亞洲遊戲展) and Rainbow Gala(zh:Rainbow Gala)
Macau: Macau Comic Festival (澳門同人節) and Illusion Feather......(refer to zh:同人誌即賣會#各地的同人誌即賣會)

Events mentioned above which you deleted are real anime events. You may search the words on Wikipedia (links mentioned above) or on search engine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SoHome (talk • contribs) 16:55, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Real events or not, there are no articles on them. That is a requirement defined by the list's introduction. And ACGHK doesn't qualify since it is a multi-genre event. --Farix (Talk) 20:54, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anime Expo

What same size are you talking about?? 206.170.104.63 (talk) 23:39, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BarnLoli for infobox cleanup/updates

This is the first Barnstar I've ever given, and you're certainly overdue to receive it. Enjoy! ^_^ —Dino guy 1000 20:18, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling of anime on my userpage

Hey, I notice you changed the spelling of anime on my userpage a few times. I like the spelling I have, so could I just keep it? Thanks --Banime (talk) 22:53, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really want your userpage to be grammatically incorrect? I sweep for this and another related grammar errors on Wikipedia from time to time, so if you continue to use the grammatically incorrect plural form, it will come up in my sweeps and I can't make any guarantees that I won't corrected again. --Farix (Talk) 23:47, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If its automated then no problem, as long as it doesn't come up as an edit war I don't mind reverting it multiple times when I see it. I just always say animes. --Banime (talk) 00:21, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MatsuriCon

Hi TheFarix, the reason I went to the AfD now instead of waiting longer is that the editor removed the {{refimprove}} and {{notability}} four times without improving the references or even asserting notability. Bongomatic (talk) 02:46, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]