Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
I realize that I posted in the Pollination discussion page but not here, but since this page was seriously affected by my editing (i.e. redirected) I should explain here too.
A partner and I are part of a class project that involved evaluating and suggesting improvements for ecology articles. For Pollination we thought the article would be more effective with an expanded structure (and some additional information) Here's our proposed structure:
Mechanics
Evolution
Pollinators
Agriculture
Environmental Impact
Other Pollination Facts (perhaps a Gallery)
Ideally for our purposes we won't be including too much new info, but to give a good support for the current info and future edits. We're also thought that the Pollinator page should be redirected to Pollination because there's a lot of redundant information between the two articles.
Anyway, we're going to be editing over the next week, so if there are comments or objections, it would be easiest if they were posted over the next few days. I hope we're not stepping on any toes here.Sclemm (talk) 12:40, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, so if the redirection is a poor idea, someone object here now - because I did wait several days over on Talk:Pollination and got no objections (I do apologize for forgetting to post here as well). I just don't see that there is enough unique information in this article to justify it being separate from Pollination.128.227.13.230 (talk) 19:14, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
