User talk:PeaceNT/Archive23

Tonight Is Goodbye

I noticed you have deleted the page for Tonight Is Goodbye, I just wondered what criteria it was deleted under, and what I would have to do to prevent it being deleted if I remade it. Ad94dug (talk) 20:19, 5 August 2008 (BST)

Thanks for the reply, I am working my way through google links for all notable information on the band. I am also in the process of getting info from the band directly, through myspace, can I use this as a source? Ad94dug (talk) 00:31, 7 August 2008 (BST)

Vote page comment

Hi there. Thanks for your comment here. Would you mind moving it to the talk page as that page is not meant to be used for threaded discussion? You can leave a link to the section on the talk page if you like (for an example of this, see oppose vote #4 here). Carcharoth (talk) 08:42, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PeaceNT. You have new messages at Moonriddengirl's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Happy First Edit Day!

HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY!

from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE

Wishing PeaceNT/Archive23 a very Happy First Edit Day!

Have a fantastic day!

From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

Hi878 (talk) 00:46, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neerchal (Kasaragod)

Thanks for the tip. It's been a while since I've contributed to Wikipedia. Shijaz (talk) 16:18, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MVAPICH

what is the problems with the notability issues on this page. we are non-commercial and our software is free-available. The software is made as a pure research project by the Ohio state University. I work for the lab and upon my professors request i am editing an entry for MVAPICH.. Please help me narrow down the issue on the MVAPICH page so i can follow the proper guidelines to contribute to Wikipedia.org

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Asampat (talk • contribs) 17:37, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Nathaniel Wedderburn

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Nathaniel Wedderburn. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. CumbrianRam (talk) 01:12, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Sausage War of 2008

Basically, there was an article on kishka sausages with the last edit Nov. 15 see here [1]. On Dec. 2 a Wikipedian came across the article and found the descriptions didn't comport with their understanding of what a kishke is, so he or she made a series of edits resulting in the article being about the Jewish kishke (and only the Jewish kishke) see here [2]. Low level guerilla warfare ensued (not really but I like to dramatize). No amount of accomodation and reason being sufficient to appease those insisting kishke can't include blood or pork (see kosher), I gave in and copied their version of the article to a new article kishka (Jewish food) and restored an improved and enhanced version of the more general kishka (food) article. I updated the disambiguation page, and now things seem mostly calm. Let me know if you have any other questions. The main article had a much longer edit history so that's why I kept it there and split off the Dec. 2 kishka (Jewish food) article. I don't really understand how to merge or update histories, so I apologize if I did something wrong.ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:49, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Next time I will try to say where the new article is from in the article creation edit summary. I guess I didn't do that in this case? Sorry about that. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:52, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Although as I look at the history it does say it was created to "disambiguate" the other article. Do you have a suggestion on how it should have been phrased? Split from? ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:53, 12 December 2008 (UTC)kht[reply]

Sorry for the confusion. Next time I will try to make it clearer what's being split from where. Thanks for your civility and efforts to make Wikipedia better. Much appreciated. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:06, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MVAPICH/MVAPICH2

Thanks for the reply. I want to explain my case clearly. The software is notable and i do not have conflict of interest since this is a purely research based software and non-profit and part of THE Ohio state University.

These are pointers to few article over last 7 years that talks about how MVAPICH provides low latency and high bandwith for supercomputers using Infiniband, RDMA interconnects. One of other similar software implementations to MVAPICH are MPICH and Openmpi. MVAPICH is part of the ofed stack which is a notable third party software.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/11/031118073440.ht http://whitepapers.zdnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=377814 http://www.globenewswire.com/newsroom/news.html?d=123477 http://www.tacc.utexas.edu/research/users/features/index.php?m_b_c=opensource

I have made so many edits over the past month ..but i still dont seem to have all the wikipedia laws straight. List of its current registered users- http://mvapich.cse.ohio-state.edu/current_users/ Its totally opensource research software used by hundreds of institutions and is non profit and i wanted it in wikipedia where a lot of people search.

Please let me know your thoughts in this matter. Thanks.