Jump to content

User talk:Scorpion0422

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RedRooster96 (talk | contribs) at 22:40, 9 February 2009 (→‎reason). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Delivered by neuro(talk) for Garden and ayematthew at 20:51, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sideshow Bob

Hey there. I notice the FAC for Sideshow Bob is facing some objections because of prose quality. I'm a big Simpsons fan, and I'd be happy to look at the writing if the current revisions don't work out. (I looked at some of the copyedit being done and some of it seems sketchy.) I can't promise I'll have time before the FAC runs out, but let me know and I'll see what I can do. Good luck! Scartol • Tok 20:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For example: Risker made this edit which I feel makes the prose more awkward in spots ("Arrangements were made to have some of the Frasier producers review the original script"), and doesn't revise writing that needs work (I will change "It was written by Ken Keeler, who had been assigned to write an episode featuring Sideshow Bob." to: "When Ken Keeler was assigned to write a Sideshow Bob episode, he was inspired by episodes of Frasier...") Cheers to Risker for taking on the task, but I think the writing still needs a thorough review. I'll see what I can do today. Scartol • Tok 14:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All done. Hope it helps! Scartol • Tok 19:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Request

Sure, I'll listen to it in a few minutes. —TheLeftorium 19:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the exact quote from Silverman: "It's a great gag (the laser removal of the tattoo) that Rich Moore did in the storyboard. Rich Moore did the board for this episode. He designed Flanders really, because he had a great drawing in the storyboard." So we know for sure that Moore did the design of Flanders, but not if he did it in the storyboard for "Simpsons Roasting on an Open Fire". TheLeftorium 19:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator of this article transferred the content to a new article, List of wind farms in Romania. In effect, he/she wants to transfer the FLC to the created article rather than just withdraw. I wasn't sure what to do, so I think you should take care of this. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for fixing the table and adding the Bure image.--Starwars1791 (talk) 03:08, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Nancy Cartwright

Sure thing. And I don't understand what that's guys point is; the fact that its not stated exactly who the calls were for, might make some people "worry" about her calling them? Ah well. Gran2 19:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And there we go. IMDb is incredibly confusing when it comes to animated shows. Gran2 14:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's looking pretty good, although I've not read the book yet, so can't pass too much judgment. Gran2 15:38, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, for whatever reason it came up, that article mentions nothing of the book. Gran2 16:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See if your FLC requests were fulfilled. igordebraga 01:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will also try to do some more research and possibly add more sources for reception and other bits, if possible. Cirt (talk) 19:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Potential COI

I think this is a good reason why WikiCup participants should declare themselves. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:16, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you place your input on this? Thanks.--TRUCO 503 02:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you reverted a user's edits in order to readd some images. [1] However, the user had done a huge clean up and major overhaul of that page, and you removed it all just to restore a minor part. That is called blind reverting, and it is an extremely bad habit to get into. I also suggest you catch up on wikipedia's fair use image policy. Non-free images must add to critical commentary, and none of the images you re-added do that. -- Scorpion0422 03:37, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they did. --Jason Palpatine (talk) 04:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup Newsletter

20:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by J Milburn, on behalf of the judges. 20:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

The nominator is not the primary contributor. The primary contributor asked to withdraw the nom for now, but I wasn't sure whether the nom should just be deleted or if it should be archived as per normal procedure. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image

I'll get to taking a look today or tomorrow. I just found a wealth of free images for numerous musical artists so I'm busy uploading them right now. I'll let you know if I find anything. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 02:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

reason

on what reason did you revert my edits? I'm just curious. ↑RR↓*96* 22:31, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One problem there, cena dain't use his RR shot for WM24, he won it on Raw. And secondly, that's what there is now, if McMahon screws him or Cena loses the Championship it can be changed. ↑RR↓*96* 22:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IRC

You are needed on there. The buggers are jumping all around and screwing up your channel. iMatthew // talk // 22:38, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]