User talk:Jezhotwells

This is Jezhotwells's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12: 7 days

William Timmons

Your Talk:William Timmons#RFC comment completely sidestepped the main issue of contention: whether the mention of a FOIA lawsuit that has nothing to do with William Timmons violates NOR. (Notice how awkwardly phrased the last sentence of B is to shoehorn it in.) Can you comment on that? Thanks. THF (talk) 19:20, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

J, thanks for your comments earlier. If you would be so kind as to read the updates and give another comment, that might help us. Dicklyon (talk) 15:40, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Love Kraft

At WP:GAN you've tagged it "requesting a second opinion", but there's no review - the "review" link on the article's Talk page leads to an empty review page. --Philcha (talk) 22:55, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

European Metropolitan Areas

Thank you for you assistance regarding List of metropolitan areas in Europe by population.

Ghaag (talk) 00:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Howard Newby

Why do you describe this editing as disruptive? It was not vandalism, but brought important information about Newby to the front of his entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.27.55.220 (talk) 23:15, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard

What is it you think ought to be posted there? --Dragonfiend (talk) 21:06, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can opublish your evidence of sock-puppetry, coi and original research. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:48, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still not sure exactly what you think ought to be posted there or why. Unless you can explain that a little better, maybe you ought to just post whatever it is you want posted? --Dragonfiend (talk) 22:03, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]